Kovoschiz's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
167065815 | 2 months ago | That's fine as the simplest case, where there is only one single continuous line. But it fails with anything more, and needs to be explored further. Eg someone could draw in even more detail for different parts of it. The arrival and departure are on different floors, and there's an inclined section in between (the departure splits into 2 sides, so 3 parallel lines). If all of them have `=jet_bridge` (eg 12 `way` in total) , it would be very confusing and complicated. |
167065815 | 2 months ago | For the use case, the "number" of jet bridges can't be counted by doing this, and `aeroway=gate` doesn't have tags for remote stands and lack of jet bridges yet. Applications would render multiple icons for them. |
167065815 | 2 months ago | As adding multiple `aeroway=jet_bridge` didn't seem the best for different sections, if it means a single "bridge" as in `man_made=bridge` . It should be one unique feature. |
167073995 | 2 months ago | 1. Please use `highway=construction` + `construction=elevator` , `construction:highway=elevator` ; not `opening_hours=`
|
167065815 | 2 months ago | This duplicates with the `aeroway=jet_bridge` areas. Someone has drawn both the fixed and moving parts, so they need to be distinguished. |
166928952 | 2 months ago | Another one https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/pull/2940 |
166928952 | 2 months ago | Graphhopper is very crude. It didn't even support multiple `via` until last year. https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/pull/3030 There's an open ticket for this, not merged yet https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/pull/3122 |
166925540 | 2 months ago | There's not really any reason to u-turn here, without any access roads or other parking (except the Hoi Wang Rd `bus_bay=` ). Going to The Austin should turn 3 lefts from Canton Rd northbound, or direct right turn on Wui Man Rd northbound from West Kowloon Station. Also no guidance is signposted.
|
166755667 | 2 months ago | 1. By the logic, those sections of CLK Rd functions as a exclusive connection to those `=motorway` ? What's the difference?
|
166928952 | 2 months ago | 1. It's also "mainly or exclusively for pedestrians." with a `vehicle=yes` case. There's even a `=destination` case which could simply be `=residential` etc, as is what's used in HK now . Clearly, your interpretation is not only how it's used. osm.wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian#Examples
|
166925540 | 2 months ago | Is this actually intended, or is a side effect? |
166928952 | 2 months ago | `=pedestrian` can still have `motor_vehicle=yes` . It simply means pedestrians is the main functionality. |
166755667 | 2 months ago | It's essentially a `=motorway` spur in all but street naming. If you haven't noticed, Shun Long Rd itself is not actually an Expressway or Tunnel Area either, but only connects with them. |
166755667 | 2 months ago | The extent of a street is not well-defined in HK. Connector roads still get gazetted and signposted as that street (using street-name signs), including interchanges and slip roads. So yours still result in an inconsistency with the westbound from the diverge of Shun Long Rd to Shun Fai Rd.
|
166781478 | 2 months ago | Should be connected. Not separated. |
166781254 | 2 months ago | Should be connected. Not separated. |
166781183 | 2 months ago | Should be connected. Not separated. |
166781087 | 2 months ago | This is forgetting to connect all vertexes. Should not be separated. |
166781003 | 2 months ago | This is forgetting to connect all vertex. Not separated. |
166780876 | 2 months ago | There's no error here. Please look at the existing situation before editing. |