`locality` means unpopulated!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74415887

Are you sure?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74509788

www.openstreetmap.org/way/198402571 Could use some specifiying
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74493129

www.openstreetmap.org/node/4327628389 Are you sure with this format?
www.openstreetmap.org/node/3510313642 Don't use such name.

1. Are those not sidewalks?
2. `crossing=traffic_signals` would be prefered in the community. `marked`/`unmarked from iD and the proposal don't sound good.

This is incorrect. The mosque building is the `amenity=place_of_worship`. The land is `landuse=religious`

1. Please use construction-related tags. Don't make it be as if it is already opened.
2. No need for such a name.
3. `surface=*` means the footway surface (default `highway:surface=*`), not bridge surface.

Ok it looks to me you are doing a lot of it wrong. Can you explain what you are trying to do?

(I thought maybe the way you deleted can be used for this purpose)

Oh my mistake. Then what do you think about that section? Should it be splited? Toll plaza in general is troublesome to define.

Also maybe some `highway` can be `secondary_link`, while the main segment a `service`
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74359804

As messaged: osm.org/changeset/74359804 Are you sure? Hong Kong’s bus lane don’t allow taxis. psv is inapplicable in vast majority of cases.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74359804

No need to remove `addr:street` for construction site. It most likely won't change
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74363130

osm.org/changeset/74365401
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74363027

No need to remove `addr:street
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74363027

The footbridge is also somehow intersected with the road.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74363027

1. Try not to delete objects
2. It's a converted industrial building. Park is definitely incorrect, but the current use should be appended.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74350635

Please don't delete Chung Kwai Chung. It's a very much a place in existence.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74336832

Path wrongly classified as cycleway
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74337770

Path wrongly changed to footway
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74337689