OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
78866770 over 5 years ago

No such acceess tagging
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78866770

78867766 over 5 years ago

You should also treat Central and Wan Chai section separately, in order to examine them.
Road classification is about function, not standard, An uninterrupted road of the same level will be preferred in any case, If you so wish, the `expressway=` tag can be adopted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78867766

78867766 over 5 years ago

If anything, Gloucester Rd should a `noref=yes` `highway=trunk`
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78867766

78867766 over 5 years ago

This is not correct. P2 road now serves a similiarly high level road.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78867766

78851248 over 5 years ago

Can you explain why osm.org/way/249207914 is deleted?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78851248

78845191 over 5 years ago

osm.org/changeset/78850919

78845191 over 5 years ago

Oh sorry, the problem is the `=stop_area` relation isn't fixed.

78843987 over 5 years ago

Hi, a name should not be added for these. You can put it in `description=` if you want. Also, next time you can add `entrance=yes` to the end of the footbridge connecting to the two buildings.

78834303 over 5 years ago

Won't it be better to map the actual `man_made=bridge` instead of doing this to the `highway=*`?

78845191 over 5 years ago

Can you please move the `railway=subway_entrance` to the actual side of the building structure area instead of putting an ambiguous node at the center?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78845191

78813309 over 5 years ago

1. `historic=yes` on its own is incorrect.
2. Why don't you make use `place=quarter` or `place=neighborhood`?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78813309

78423929 over 5 years ago

Added description osm.org/changeset/78823508

78423929 over 5 years ago

我不太清楚哪個才是正確,只是原則是記錄最普遍名稱(即使可能錯),要知道廣泛情況才可改名,否則只能加名,由其不能移除舊名。
之後可以再註明。

78186652 over 5 years ago

1. Then we should probably separate `landuse=commercial` from `amenity=exhibition_centre`, since it's not part of the exhibition center itself.
2. Lung Wo Rd is `covered=yes` only. It doesn't pass through a building, but between two.

78536053 over 5 years ago

Google Maps will review you suggest first, before adding.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78536053

78536053 over 5 years ago

Thanks btw. I further edited it.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78536053

78580479 over 5 years ago

Thx
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78580479

78500509 over 5 years ago

Hello?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78500509

78500452 over 5 years ago

Are you going to fix this?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78500452

78564301 over 5 years ago

Please don't tag for renderer.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78564301