Kovoschiz's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
78866770 | over 5 years ago | No such acceess tagging
|
78867766 | over 5 years ago | You should also treat Central and Wan Chai section separately, in order to examine them.
|
78867766 | over 5 years ago | If anything, Gloucester Rd should a `noref=yes` `highway=trunk`
|
78867766 | over 5 years ago | This is not correct. P2 road now serves a similiarly high level road.
|
78851248 | over 5 years ago | Can you explain why osm.org/way/249207914 is deleted?
|
78845191 | over 5 years ago | |
78845191 | over 5 years ago | Oh sorry, the problem is the `=stop_area` relation isn't fixed. |
78843987 | over 5 years ago | Hi, a name should not be added for these. You can put it in `description=` if you want. Also, next time you can add `entrance=yes` to the end of the footbridge connecting to the two buildings. |
78834303 | over 5 years ago | Won't it be better to map the actual `man_made=bridge` instead of doing this to the `highway=*`? |
78845191 | over 5 years ago | Can you please move the `railway=subway_entrance` to the actual side of the building structure area instead of putting an ambiguous node at the center?
|
78813309 | over 5 years ago | 1. `historic=yes` on its own is incorrect.
|
78423929 | over 5 years ago | Added description osm.org/changeset/78823508 |
78423929 | over 5 years ago | 我不太清楚哪個才是正確,只是原則是記錄最普遍名稱(即使可能錯),要知道廣泛情況才可改名,否則只能加名,由其不能移除舊名。
|
78186652 | over 5 years ago | 1. Then we should probably separate `landuse=commercial` from `amenity=exhibition_centre`, since it's not part of the exhibition center itself.
|
78536053 | over 5 years ago | Google Maps will review you suggest first, before adding.
|
78536053 | over 5 years ago | Thanks btw. I further edited it.
|
78580479 | over 5 years ago | Thx
|
78500509 | over 5 years ago | Hello?
|
78500452 | over 5 years ago | Are you going to fix this?
|
78564301 | over 5 years ago | Please don't tag for renderer.
|