Kovoschiz's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
93357950	almost 5 years ago	HI please don't do this. The practice is to put them at the center of activity. This is something to be considered by a map renderer, and doing so is seen as editing for the renderer osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
93338764	almost 5 years ago	Dragged node, irrelevant content --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93338764
93295618	almost 5 years ago	Sorry, I meant that you should check other portions when splitting.
93295618	almost 5 years ago	The convention here is to classify `_link` by the higher rank road as well.
93295618	almost 5 years ago	There's no need to add a turning restriction when the connecting road is already constrained by a legal access restriction, not to mention it doesn't considered the `access=private` element.
93296653	almost 5 years ago	Please keep top level tags to a single value --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93296653
93295618	almost 5 years ago	This is not correct. There's no physical separation. It's already properly set up with turning restriction, `change:lanes=` and `turn:lanes=` --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93295618
93234484	almost 5 years ago	osm.org/way/444180322/ this is a combined soccer and basketball area. Something else should be done about it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93234484
93234484	almost 5 years ago	Please don't remove `is_in:*=`. It's only deprecated when there are `boundary=administrative`. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93234484
93231923	almost 5 years ago	Please don't remove `highway=traffic_signals` with `ref=`, at least until the junction/crossing is modeled; and it can be coverted into a `man_made=street_cabinet` or junction area. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93231923
93201266	almost 5 years ago	I agree with the left turn, but what about the right turn? It's noticeably curved, not a standard intersection. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93201266
93189536	almost 5 years ago	Physically this isn't the best solution. The split is moved closer to the actual point here https://osmcha.org/changesets/93191048 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93189536
93131540	almost 5 years ago	https://osmcha.org/changesets/93190353 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93131540
93131540	almost 5 years ago	Please split up the road to not make the restriction over-extend. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93131540
93125409	almost 5 years ago	Can you explain changing `=unclassified` to `=residential`? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93125409
93107131	almost 5 years ago	You need to change `name:en=` as well. https://osmcha.org/changesets/93114688 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93107131
93051916	almost 5 years ago	Can pedestrians pass through? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93051916
93035880	almost 5 years ago	`place=village` is only used for larger settlements. https://osmcha.org/changesets/93042445 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93035880
92985365	almost 5 years ago	2. Yet again, it's a matter of degree and considerations. Rail-side-wise, Airport Express is obviously in the same "network"; PT-service-wise, your raised a good question, but yet again I don't find partial integration to be an issue denying consideration as one "network".
92985365	almost 5 years ago	1. That's what the `brand=` could be for.