OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
67964538 over 6 years ago

This looks perfect, thanks for importing!

65923262 over 6 years ago

Sure, I'll revert this later today. I originally thought that adding the name=* tag was a good idea, but later found that OsmAnd rendered the name of the area:highways, cluttering up the rendering. This changeset, though, is tagging for the renderer, as I now see. OsmAnd should change, not osm. I'll revert this.

65807922 over 6 years ago

Thanks! Should I resolve the note now?

65763946 over 6 years ago

True, it can be considered a "park", but it is not a city park like the Osm definition of "park".

65296511 over 6 years ago

The Overpass Turbo Query Wizard does not handle emoji. Reverting might be hard. We would really like you to revert this edit - it is not part of the OSM community culture to revert other contributors intentional edits.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Brc4VFihJ0MxROzQkU78QhZ41xBnC0hM/view?usp=sharing

65488941 over 6 years ago

Several, actually.

65296511 over 6 years ago

I think that emoji are more fun, but they can also break existing programs that are expecting plain text.

60111478 over 6 years ago

The amount of wood you are adding is amazing! It is super high resolution, and does not overlap with roads. Nice job!
I have also been adding wood in Chapel Hill, NC, but have not yet added as much as you.
Leif Rasmussen

60603308 over 6 years ago

The tag wood=* is depreciated. Could you use leaf_type and leaf_cycle instead?

64852040 over 6 years ago

Looks good!

64832282 over 6 years ago

Thanks!

61139825 over 6 years ago

See www.osm.org/changeset/64828972

61139825 over 6 years ago

Good point about not needing the tag "natural"="coastline"! I have removed all of the tags from the coastlines, so everything should look much cleaner now.

64325852 almost 7 years ago

By the way, I would use NC Latest Orthoimagery to map woods, because Bing's imagery is very out of date.

64332825 almost 7 years ago

Nice!

64366816 almost 7 years ago

oneway=no can be useful in rare instances, just so that you know. StreetComplete finds likely oneway roads without oneway=* and asks "is this road oneway?". Removing oneway=no could possibly, in those rare instances, make StreetComplete ask the same question again. Not really an issue, though.

63733841 almost 7 years ago

By the way, HOV lanes that are not separated from a motorway by a real physical barrier (such as a concrete wall or stretch of grass) are not mapped separately, but rather as tags added to the main motorway. See osm.wiki/Key:hov#hov:lanes
Thanks for your contributions,
Leif Rasmussen

64148371 almost 7 years ago

Make sure to mark the task as mapped once you have imported all features inside, even if some buildings are still missing. This tasks was accidentally double imported, and it would be better if that did not happen again. I have reverted the newer changeset by mangokm40_import to remove the duplicated buildings and addresses, so no damage was done.
Thanks for helping us with importing!
Leif Rasmussen

64166428 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
houston_mapper1 had already imported the features in this task, but did not mark the task as mapped for some reason. This means that this changeset created 1000s of duplicate features. I have reverted it using changeset #64167648, so no damage was done.
Thanks,
Leif

64097671 almost 7 years ago

Whoops! Wrong comment. Correct comment:
Imported addresses and buildings. #osmus-tasks-83 osm.wiki/Miami-Dade_County_Address_Import