LivInTheLookingGlass's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
57169677 | over 7 years ago | Please use more accurate changeset messages
|
57169525 | over 7 years ago | Please use more accurate changeset messages
|
57169586 | over 7 years ago | Please use more accurate changeset messages
|
57167951 | over 7 years ago | Please use a more accurate changeset message
|
57167810 | over 7 years ago | This changeset does not comply with current OSM standards. I'll go in and fix it, but in the future please add lifecycle tags. You can find a page about it on wiki.openstreetmap.org
|
57167715 | over 7 years ago | Please try to use a better changeset message in the future
|
57163728 | over 7 years ago | If you don't mind me asking, why not add that POI as the building directly behind the gas station roof?
|
57211552 | over 7 years ago | Hi. I'm not sure I believe your tagging here. Doesn't seem like there would be a hockey arena, nor a corporate office, in an industrial zone. I'm going to revert this until you can provide a source for this.
|
57214705 | over 7 years ago | Hi! You got flagged on OsmCha as a possible import. I don't think you're doing anything wrong here, but would you mind answering two questions?
|
57090551 | over 7 years ago | Not sure about that dividing line you added on the riverbank (it got you flagged on OsmCha, I think). I would take another look at that, but otherwise this looks fine to me.
|
57099613 | over 7 years ago | Hey. Just letting you know that all your recent edits got flagged on OsmCha for "unknown iD instance". You might want to check your editor to make sure that this isn't a big deal.
|
57099047 | over 7 years ago | Hi. Not a big deal, just next time please also leave a connection to the sidewalk. Makes it easier for pedestrian navigation. Thanks!
|
57121163 | over 7 years ago | Hi! It looks like you just added an area to the map with no other details. I assume this was unintentional, so I'm gonna remove that, since it's currently just map clutter. Feel free to add it back with more detail. For instance, this looks to my eye like it's a school.
|
56480748 | over 7 years ago | It makes it a lot harder to verify that it's a good changeset. Ones this large tend to get flagged (which yours did), and then you have to pan around through a large chunk of the world. I'm not trying to yell, or be a jerk, just saying that it's nicer to the people who review these things if you upload more frequently. |
56667853 | over 7 years ago | Hey. It looks like you deleted a bunch of TIGER data in this. Would you mind explaining why?
|
56509856 | over 7 years ago | Do not remove real, physical features just because you think they are unnecessary. |
56501815 | over 7 years ago | Please don't randomly delete objects. Yes, that was in the wrong spot, but it had information from a government import. By deleting it, you make it more likely for it to be accidentally imported again. It would have been better to just move it. |
56477845 | over 7 years ago | Hi. The geometry on this changeset doesn't look quite right. Can you confirm that there's actually a park there? Because it looks like you just added it over your home to collect Pokemon Go stuff. I've deleted the park for now, but if you could upload a picture to Mapillary or OpenStreetCam as evidence that would be nice. |
55922495 | over 7 years ago | Hi. Please add more details than an address next time. I'll fix it up for you, but for the future, please note that more detail is appreciated.
|
55945841 | over 7 years ago | Please don't remove real features just because you suspect it's from PoGo. Removing the name would have been reasonable, but there is an actual body of water there which seems to be permanent.
|