it might have been an accident(josm) not downloading the relation or something, I usually try to not screw up canvec forests, I try to fix the many overlapping forest's lakes and wetlands polygons

I don't see how adding addresses broke it, but i'll check it later tonight

woops, I usually delete that key/transform it into addr:housenumber. Sorry about that, fixed now

Never mind, apparently I apparently skipped over it 14 -> 16 for some reason

I already created PTv2 for route 15, why are you recreating it?

what the. fu-...... Good god that's a lot of trees!

If they are wrong, more power to ya! It's going to be a lot of work upgrading the bus routes to PTv2, so I'm glad I'm not alone

Mind not moving my bus stops that have been verified (mapillary) and moved to the exact location?

For example Node 6817903465 you moved it to the corner when it is not: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.4293349&lng=-75.6842723&z=17&pKey=hJ5HLovxGc4Cb2uhBRAQQg&focus=photo

The stops with stops on the way that I have created have been verified via mapillary, if you move them, it's just creating extra work for me

Just an FYI, the Stops/Platforms have to be the first items in the routes and not after the ways like you are doing

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-75.82344&lat=45.32464&zoom=17&overlays=ptv2_routes_,ptv2_routes_valid,ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes

Why undelete when it's been upgraded to PTv2?
osm.org/relation/10058414

osm.org/relation/10058413

osm.org/relation/10058531

Why maintain two schemas when PTv1 is inferior for varying routes

sure, no problemo

I will invite you to read the lamp_mount wiki values.

osm.wiki/Key:lamp_mount

and then have the pleasure of reading lamp_type:
osm.wiki/Key:lamp_type

I will change to height instead of lamp_height

it's old turn restrictions, I've corrected the way split around median as well as removed the old turn restrictions that were preventing right turns.

C'était des vieilles restrictions de tournage. J'ai corrigé la rue où elle vire autours de la médianne et j'ai ôté les restrictions qui t'empêchait de virer à droite

The way you mapped it dates back to <July 2016 when they started construction on a new bike friendly intersection(https://www.google.com/maps/@45.4028782,-75.6743584,3a,75y,284.9h,86.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7toKRFb2wDuvPIDp5zXBTQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) The intersection now looks like this(https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.4026998&lng=-75.674418&z=19.689613798196362&pKey=E-_xPNzw_yYqtLvZVnd23g&focus=photo) in 2019. Don't insult our intelligence sir. Bing satellite imagery is 3+ years out of date. ESRI World Imagery has a more up to date version for that intersection

La façon tu l'as carthographié date de <Juillet 2016 quand ils ont commencer la construction pour une intersection pro-bicycle(https://www.google.com/maps/@45.4028782,-75.6743584,3a,75y,284.9h,86.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7toKRFb2wDuvPIDp5zXBTQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) L'intersection a maintenant l'aire de ceci (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.4026998&lng=-75.674418&z=19.689613798196362&pKey=E-_xPNzw_yYqtLvZVnd23g&focus=photo) en 2019. Ne parles pas de ton cul. L'imagerie de Bing est 3+ ans de vieux. ESRI World Imagery a l'imagerie plus à jour pour cette intersection

osm.org/changeset/73208555
For explanation of revert

Reverted:
osm.org/changeset/73209034
osm.org/changeset/73208895
osm.org/changeset/73208714
osm.org/changeset/73208555

I have reverted your changeset as you obviously DID NOT survey the area locally, it's been updated 2 years ago. You are just arm chair mapping and passing it off as local survey. If you remodify this intersection again I will be reporting you to the data working group

J'ai reverté ton changement parce que tu n'as évidemment PAS VISITÉ la place en personne parce que ca FAIT 2 ANS IL A ÉTÉ MISE À JOUR. Tu fait juste du cartographiage de ton sofa et a évidemment pas fait de recherche. Si tu modifies cette intersection encore, je vais contacter le data working group

The addresses were merged down:
http://dev.overpass-api.de/tmp/psv/achavi/index.html?changeset=72782912

Maybe that's why you are seeing the source tag?

Unless you are speaking of addresses?
http://gatineau.ca/donneesouvertes/fiche_metadonnees_fr.aspx?id=1393013950

these were hand traced, whats the connection with open data portal?

Could you stop changing the building types from detatched to house. This is the incorrect tagging for a detatched house.

Est-ce que tu pourrais arrêter de changer detatched à house? C'est le mauvais tag pour des maisons détachée