Why did you delete grass features where grass exists simply because they weren't a park? You can only delete features if the feature no longer exists. You need to put back the grass you deleted

Just a heads up that rails with no visible traces should be tagged as razed, not abandoned. So for example, the roundhouse track would qualify. osm.wiki/Demolished_Railway

That is correct, thanks for removal and info

Just a heads up you seem to have changed a lot of residential roads that are in subdivisions and connected to house driveways to minor/unclassified. Please don't revert residential classification in subdivisions

I'm doing the Maproulette level_crossing audit. One of the checks (https://maproulette.org/challenge/25236/task/125239461) is flagged because the level_crossing is on a razed rail.

However, FRA data still shows a single track in this area. Therefore, I believe the track tag razed should be reversed and the planned: prefix used for the FEC double tracking. If the track for https://maproulette.org/challenge/25236/task/125239461 has indeed already been razed and the double track is being build out right now then construction: prefix should be used.

Please let me know your thoughts

Appreciate the mapping of Phoenix metro. I would suggest instead of using the generic building tag w/ Rapid you take a second to provide more details by updating the tag to detached house where clearly such before uploading in the future. Thanks!

Next time you add buildings please use better tags. For example, use 'detached house' instead of 'building' for buildings that are clearly such as was the case with this changeset