Sorry for missing no, it should be "JOSM validator complains if there is no name:lang tag matching name tag".

"Missing name:* translation - Missing name:*=ولیعصر شمالی. Add tag with correct language key. (1)" visible for osm.org/node/3596191189 after enabling detailed validation (setting called in "Show informational level" in validator settings).

Can you look at osm.org/note/1258544 ?

There are other suspiciously named villages, I will not spam notes for all of them.

And osm.org/note/1258542 ?

And osm.org/note/1258539 ?

Can you look at osm.org/note/1258528 ?

"or in Farsi? " (sorry for misspelling)

"This automatic edit was discussed in Iran OSM Telegram Group." - is discussion in English or in Farse?

I am curious whatever people were unaware about reason for repeating name tag in local language or whatever they were aware and for some reason thought that it is harmful.

But deleting name:fa means that information about local language was lost.

And it is not just me, JOSM validator complains if there is name:lang tag matching name tag.

For example, currently I am starting to preparing for edit that will add missing name:pl in Poland, exact opposite of 2. point in this edit.

Can you look at osm.org/note/1258234 ?

Can you look at osm.org/note/1258232 ?

Can you look at osm.org/note/1258231 ?

I am not sure is it something interesting for you, but as byproduct of my querrying I have list of name where it is very likely that name:lang tags are missing. Are you maybe interested in fixing some of issues similar to this one?

Can you look at osm.org/note/1258150 ?

"Removing duplicated [name:fa] tags with exact same value of [name] tag." - it is not duplication, it is an useful information.

Where this automatic edit was discussed?

Are you sure that at osm.org/node/4699830889#map=16/39.8925/29.6542 there is really an alpine hut named "A"?

" Removing duplicated [name:fa] tags with exact same value of [name] tag." - why you did this?

It is a very useful information, with that we know what is the language of the name.

Can you look at this note - osm.org/note/1258067 ?

Also, what is the source of data? How you obtained country-wide data about locations of tourism attractions?

osm.org/note/1258067