OpenStreetMap標誌 OpenStreetMap

Changeset 評論
169446620 2日前

dzięki!

169428545 3日前

Hello!

What is the source and license of imagery you use to map?

How do you know that this unusual aerial imagery can be used?

It looks very much like proxied Google Maps imagery. Which would be a big problem.

169386151 4日前

Yes, I noticed that this edit was a bit pointless (trivial modification of URL, not expanding https://www.kfc.com/ to branch link)

I will fix this bug before restarting bot.

169055493 4日前

I see that you mass edited landuse=farmland crop=rice to landuse=paddy crop=rice

have you discussed this mass edit as required? See osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

It looks like a part of mass retagging, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=paddy#overview

169336587 4日前

thanks for investigation and fix!

155620956 4日前

osm.org/node/6635010908 - to nie jest czasem stopień wodny raczej niż wodospad?

156543421 5日前

Z drugą relacją - nie pamiętam tego, ale jesteś pewien że tam tak można jechać?

156543421 5日前

Czemu skasowałeś osm.org/relation/9937182/history ?

Czy jesteś pewien że teraz rowery mogą tu w lewo skręcać?

Ostatnio jak tam byłem to był pas do jazdy na wprost i skręt w lewo był dla rowerów nielegalny

167434366 5日前

Thanks!

151844489 5日前

Can you take a look at osm.org/note/4869787 ?

157893867 5日前

osm.org/note/4869846 can you take look at that? Looks like Rostic/KFC confusion

160581783 5日前

can you take a look at osm.org/note/4869847

looks like a Rostic/KFC confusion

134488982 5日前

And osm.org/note/4869826 ?

36287906 5日前

Can you take look at osm.org/note/4869827 ?

115633874 5日前

Can you take look at osm.org/note/4869828 ?

98079084 5日前

Can you take look at osm.org/note/4869829 ?

161121609 5日前

Can you take look at osm.org/note/4869831 ?

134191130 5日前

Can you take look at osm.org/note/4869832 ?

168920932 5日前

(tagging for osm.org/node/681949203/history is now fixed)

168920932 5日前

Please, can you upgrade Every Door to a new version?

In this version you left bogus tagging for disused pharmacy - 6.0 has this bug fixed