see also osm.org/note/425638

osm.org/relation/1918067 tagged in this region describes object of type explicitly mentioned in osm.org/welcome as something not welcomed in OSM ("What it doesn't include is opinionated data like ratings, historical or hypothetical features").

It seems that it should be deleted.

see also osm.org/note/425636

osm.org/node/1049342953/history - is it now opened?

see also osm.org/note/425635

osm.org/way/53821342 - is it real proposal? If not - it should be deleted.

If it exists - proposed=yes should be gone.

If it seriously proposed - please use rather highway=proposed, proposed=footway

see also osm.org/note/425634

osm.org/way/36478401 - is it demolished? In that case it should be deleted from OSM rather than kept with demolished=yes

Zdjęcie przykładowe to tylko przykład - tekst jest ważniejszy. Na początek: "The path may have any type of surface. "

"path to bliżej nieokreślona ścieżka (taka wydeptana). " - tak, path to ścieżka. Ale highway=path jest zdefiniowane inaczej niż jako wydeptana ścieżka (tak, to jest mylące).

"To nie są łączone chodniki z DDR" - te które poprawiłem - są. Np. osm.org/way/46619382/history#map=16/50.0615/19.9574

Zobacz też osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_Universal_Tag

"zwłaszcza że na stronie o path jest mowa, że należy ją (path) stosować gdy pozostałe oznaczenia nie mogą być stosowane lub są niewystarczające. " Gdzie to jest?

generator:method fusion on osm.org/node/3224899451 indicate that something went really wrong

I removed tags from this object - in case that only fusion was a mistake it would be a good idea to retag this feature.

river join stream and is downgraded to stream

either it is not river or it should continue as river (I am not mapping it remotely - maybe there is an unmapped sinkhole or something here)

see osm.org/note/422165

see osm.org/note/422169 and other nearby notes

river join stream and is downgraded to stream

either it is not river or it should continue as river (I am not mapping it remotely - maybe there is an unmapped sinkhole or something here)

Proszę, podaj źródła dla highway=proposed takich jak osm.org/way/250191236 (dodaj informacje w polu source w drogach które są proponowane)

Thanks!

Why osm.org/node/3095362841#map=19/48.65969/2.09319 is tagged with access:bicycle=yes instead of standard bicycle=yes? (the same with pedestrian access)

Why osm.org/way/164444474/history#map=19/50.02864/12.15683 is tagged with access:bicycle=yes instead of standard bicycle=yes? (the same with pedestrian access)

Why osm.org/node/3152712173#map=19/48.14061/16.31383 is tagged with access:bicycle=yes instead of standard bicycle=yes? The same happened with some other access tags.

Thanks!