note that files at SC server are temporary, there is no use in adding them in image tags

Hello! osm.org/node/11503139201/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

Hello! osm.org/node/10184258964/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

Hello! osm.org/node/5907119352/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

Hello! osm.org/node/9491021528/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

Hello! osm.org/node/4296608211/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

Hello! osm.org/node/4295769679/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

Hello! osm.org/node/12495744205/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

Hello! osm.org/node/12737621217/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

Hello! osm.org/node/10284109155/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

Hello! osm.org/node/10236115285/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian - zastosuj się do tych zaleceń, proszę

Hello! osm.org/way/1026168113/history has shop = mini_markert that was added in this edit
shop=mini_markert ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it shop=convenience?

(see osm.wiki/Tag:shop=convenience )

Hello! osm.org/way/983363251/history has shop = vape that was added in this edit
shop=vape ? Could it be tagged as osm.wiki/Tag:shop=e-cigarette (if shop=vape / shop=vaping / shop=vape_store is needed - how it differs or is better than shop=e-cigarette ?)

Hello! osm.org/node/10281181981/history has shop = vape that was added in this edit
shop=vape ? Could it be tagged as osm.wiki/Tag:shop=e-cigarette (if shop=vape / shop=vaping / shop=vape_store is needed - how it differs or is better than shop=e-cigarette ?)

Hello! osm.org/node/4454956087/history has shop = vape that was added in this edit
shop=vape ? Could it be tagged as osm.wiki/Tag:shop=e-cigarette (if shop=vape / shop=vaping / shop=vape_store is needed - how it differs or is better than shop=e-cigarette ?)

Hello! osm.org/node/9675632005/history has shop = vape that was added in this edit
shop=vape ? Could it be tagged as osm.wiki/Tag:shop=e-cigarette (if shop=vape / shop=vaping / shop=vape_store is needed - how it differs or is better than shop=e-cigarette ?)

Hello! osm.org/way/1113018791/history has roof:type = pyramidal that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape was intended here?

See osm.wiki/Key:roof:shape

Hello! osm.org/way/913669955/history has roof:type = pyramidal that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape was intended here?

See osm.wiki/Key:roof:shape

Hello! osm.org/way/704905877/history has roof:type = pyramidal that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape was intended here?

See osm.wiki/Key:roof:shape