"I did the change manually in JOSM after saving the output from overpass-turbo, is it considered as an automatic edit ?"

Manual, with review of every change?

Manual edit

Mass search-replace without reviewing every edited object?

Automatic edit

Note that tricky part is what counts as a "review", I would go that it depends on local knowledge. In general I would be uncomfortable with adding brand:wikidata tags based solely on a name match without ground survey, but I happily change remotely wikipedia into brand:wikipedia tags.

osm.org/node/5380005707/history - how you know that this car repair shop in South Africa is a part of brand, not an independent shop?

source=overpass suggests that this is an automatic edit - can you link to place where it was discussed?

Raczej nie, takich obiektów jest olbrzymia ilość i są praktycznie niemożliwe do mapowania w ramach OSM (można próbować łapać remonty i budowy ale takie dane są niemożliwe do weryfikacji).

Chyba o osm.org/way/142913375#map=14/50.0759/19.8505 które na razie chyba nie jest w budowie.

Thanks for a reply!

I would simply not map it within OSM in that case. It is not easy to survey, any change applies to all locations. And ownership issues are frequently often very messy and complex.

I think that it may be better to record it at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3181430 - at least it fixes problem of mapping the same info 75 times.

For app: tags - if that was accepted on talk-se (or equivalent - can you link me to the TG Openstreetmap chat dicussion?) I will leave it alone. But main reason why I am not fan of it is that

(1) any change applies to all elements
(2) I see no serious value in adding this data, and I would not expect it to be used
(3) if that would become actually used then there is a serious security risk with someone replacing link to a phishing app

ops, sorry for wrong changeset tags - it was a manually reviewed edit

ops, sorry for wrong changeset tags - it was a manually reviewed edit

ops, sorry for wrong changeset tags - it was a manually reviewed edit

I already changed wrong "wikipedia" to "brand:wikipedia". I think that tags app:apple, app:google, owner, ownership, source:owner should be removed.

For start: query that finds affected objects - http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/HwI

I added fixing this edit to my TODO list but I am not promising anything (my OSM related TODO list is quite long).

I removed fixme=yes tag in as it was unclear what was its meaning and during survey in this location I was unsure what needs to be checked (edited in osm.org/changeset/68677910 )

What is the emaning of fixme=yes for osm.org/way/57778369 ?

Do you have source for borders of Observatorio Pierre Auger? Mapping individual detectors is nice, but it would be great to map also entire Observatorio Pierre Auger.

What represents single node like osm.org/node/6362695693 ?

It is tagged as entire Detector Cherenkov monitoring_station described at https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/es:Observatorio%20Pierre%20Auger?uselang=en

but each of 1640 nodes tagged like this (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Huy) seems to be rather an individual detector - what is this? Antenna?

man_made=monitoring_station should be probably not added for individual detectors.

And wikipedia=es:Observatorio Pierre Auger should be certainly present only on object representing entire observatory.

Zerkniesz na osm.org/note/1726785 ?

Dodałem do osm.org/way/678166526#map=19/51.80208/19.74742 informację że to jest sklep.

W iD lepiej wyszukać "supermarket" (w przypadku sieciówek działa czasem wyszukiwanie po nazwie, np "Lidl"), a potem dodać informacje o typie budynku.

(brakowało tagu shop=supermarket)

For osm.org/node/5737572382/history you probably wanted to link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_wolf - not a television series

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/68580191

OK, changed on both