Matija Nalis's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
86615695 | over 2 years ago | Pozdrav, vidim da je ova kuća u Kninu: osm.org/way/129444311/history označena imenom "Grgić Ante"? Na OSM-u ne upisujemo imena privatnih vlasnika kuća (radi privatnosti).
|
128434072 | over 2 years ago | Hi, I see you have mapped some ways (e.g. w147187483, w940364164) as having "cycleway:right=separate"; however there is no separately mapped way right of them (only buildings). Do you know what happened there / what is correct state?
|
129451777 | over 2 years ago | |
124625675 | over 2 years ago | Hi, I've noticed you've marked this amenity=drinking_water as disused. However, I was there just few days earlier on 2022-06-26 and it was working fine (but it need to be pressed by foot to activate! see metal button on the lower right on wikimedia_commons picture on it! as shown in description=* tag) |
128534041 | over 2 years ago | related: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-do-youthmappers-teachosm/5501 |
127805547 | over 2 years ago | related: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-do-youthmappers-teachosm/5501 |
128909577 | over 2 years ago | related discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/shadowy-supertaggers/5543 |
128702409 | over 2 years ago | Da, skužio sam poslije pa dopisao na Discourseu da je to zapravo kasniji Vespucci upload. Hvala! |
128683008 | over 2 years ago | Pozdrav, vidim da označavaš farmland, a izvor podataka je naveden DGU. Možeš li nam reći koji je točno DGU WMS (ili koji već izvor) u pitanju? Javi nam se na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/venkov-vandalizam/5299 |
128659326 | over 2 years ago | Venko, potrgao si multipolygon i cijela šuma je nestala desetinama kilometara uokrug Ogulina. Vedran_V je popravio u slijedećim changesetima, ali bih te molio da nam se javiš na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/venkov-vandalizam/5299/4?u=matija_nalis oko tog i drugih problema sa tvojim kartiranjem, kako bi dogovorili kako da dalje surađujemo. |
128702409 | over 2 years ago | Pozdrav, primjećujem da neke od zgrada koje kreiraš se preklapaju preko drugih skoro istih takvih ali pomaknuti, npr. osm.org/way/1095131521 + osm.org/way/1096958415, osm.org/way/1096958429 + osm.org/way/1095131519, osm.org/way/1095131515 + osm.org/way/1096958428) i sl. O čemu se tu radi, da li ih precrtavaš/importaš odnekuda, i ako da, od kuda? Također, molio bih te da se javiš u raspravu na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/venkov-vandalizam/5299 kako bi raspravili situaciju, jer se dosta HR korisnika žali na probleme koje tvoje kartiranje uzrokuje. Unaprijed hvala na odazivu! |
44740826 | over 2 years ago | Pozdrav, vidim da ste na OpenStreetMapu pred nekoliko godina označili osm.org/way/462413160 i dr. sa "surface=cement" na ulici Petra Svačića u Baškoj Vodi. Pretpostavljam da ste mislili na "surface=concrete" umjesto toga? Pitam radi: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mysterious-surface-cement/5158 |
113781143 | over 2 years ago | hm, Vranovci su dobili wikidata Q1284357 od Bukovlje? osm.org/node/527435012 |
115379894 | about 3 years ago | yes, it is likely from my fork; as it does not change anything specific about the version there. It gets based around upstream master when I pull it, which is probably not at exact release versions in upstream. The version string `39.0-alpha` seems to be introduced in this upstream commit - https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/commit/3f32f2086a6f1f3750de539afec62573ed564051 so my fork was based on some upstream SC version after that (and at or before my version https://github.com/mnalis/StreetComplete/commit/fde68869a8a538c68b785fe2706f863f90bb11e4) |
103525351 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I see you've added `highway=proposed` way: osm.org/way/934592248 Could you also add `proposed=*` tag osm.wiki/Key:proposed and `source` / `note` tags indicating who/where proposed it? Or just let me know here, and I'll add it. |
111542230 | over 3 years ago | Hi @emarton and welcome to OSM! Please note that OSM maps ALL ways and objects that are physically present on the ground. If some of them are private, correct way is to mark them as private under "Allowed Access" section in iD; and not to delete them. (deleting is only for situations when the object has been verified to no longer physically exists) I have now corrected the changeset. Cheers! |
97599805 | over 4 years ago | @ameman444 Just FYI, it is mapping using Aerial images of buildings and highways, due to recent earthquakes in Croatia. More details available at https://tasks.osm-hr.org/project/11 |
95876298 | over 4 years ago | popravio preostali dio duplih ways, otvorio par Notes za resurvey... |
95723674 | over 4 years ago | ispopravljao sam u više changeseta |
95616444 | over 4 years ago | ispopravljano kroz nekoliko changeseta |