navodno puštena u pogon; maknuo sam access=no i barrier=block isto, i spojio biciklističke (ima li i dalje na spoju za bicikle?) - https://kaportal.net.hr/aktualno/vijesti/karlovac/1358872/u-promet-pustena-nova-cesta-ilovac-orlovac-izgradile-je-hrvatske-zeljeznice-to-je-dio-projekta-izgradnje-drugog-kolosijeka-pruge/ #surveyme

Website works just fine, see e.g. http://web.archive.org/web/20250509121736/https://www.parasailing.com.hr/. User has contacted local OSM group, so we're helping him to re-add it will full tags. I'll revert this changeset.

Given the node on which name tag was removed, referenced wiki is likely osm.wiki/Tag:place=ocean - but I haven't really seen a discussion on the issue either

Pozdrav, i hvala na sudjelovanju u OSM mapathonu!

Ispravio sam ovdje uličnu lampu sa tagom osm.wiki/Tag:highway=street_lamp

Također, "name" tag koristimo samo za prava imena (npr. naziv kafića, trgovine, muzeja...) a ne za opise.

Ukoliko imaš bilo kakvih dodatnih pitanja ili nejasnoća, slobodno pitaj ovdje ili na nekom od komunikacijskih kanala: https://osm-hr.org/openstreetmap-hrvatska/

Hvala još jednom i nadam se da je bilo zanimljivo!

Hi, I see you've set `bicycle=no` on many secondary roads where I do not see explicit signs prohibiting bicycles. In Croatia, bicycles are only implicitly disallowed on `highway=motorway` and "Brze ceste rezervirane za promet motornih vozila" (usually `highway=trunk`). Everywhere else, bicycles are allowed (you may want to add `class:bicycle:non_experienced=-x` to indicate it's not a good idea even if lawful)

Also, if there is cycleway alongside a road, please use `bicycle=use_sidepath` instead of `bicycle=no`.

Mala je vjerojatnost da se sjećaš od pred 13 godina, ali ovaj izgleda parking u Zadru si označio kao driving_school? imaš možda ideju? osm.org/note/4279099

Sjećaš li se gdje si točno vidio bicycle_repair_station kod AKC Medika (osm.org/node/9242979091), jer ga ne pronalazim?

Hi Miro! Your enthusiasm is appreciated, but please do not do such huge unilateral changes as modifying `admin_level` without prior consultation with Croatian community. I'm going to revert this (as preliminary decided in Croatian telegram channel), and have opened a topic in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/admin-level-u-hrvatskoj/120865 for further discussion.

Please feel free to explain there why you think `admin_level` should be changed in Croatia; and then we can proceed after the community consensus is reached.

Thanks in advance!

Thanks for your insight; I've created a topic at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adding-image-menu-on-resturants/120806 to try to find community consensus

Hi @mueschel!

I gather you imply that explicit owner permission should be required? Can you clarify why you think so?

@Mateusz, "building=maybe" meant that it is unclear from aerial view whether that is a building or ruins or something else (parking?...)

When DGU Croatia 2024 aerials get published, perhaps we'd see better. (or if someone on the ground surveys)

Pozdrav, je li osm.org/way/140487087 zaista autoškola? Izgleda kao parking. Ili se možda koristi (i) kao poligon za testne vožnje?

Hi, thanks for the notice, and sorry for a delay! If you know opening_date (when it will be fully finished), it would be good to add that tag, so it can be checked semi-automatically when finished (e.g. via osm.wiki/Key:opening_date#Practical_useand either online survey or armchair news searches). But if that "almost" is really just few weeks away, I'm also fine if you prefer to mark them as finished (I've seen too many that get to 90% and then stop due to various issues and turn to ruins instead of being finished, so I personally prefer not to try predicting the future).

As for the imagery, DGU Imagery for Croatia for 2022 (and newer) you can find on https://github.com/osm-hr/mapproxy-hr/ or https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dgu-ortofoto-2021-2022-2023/116081/5

I've added sources to changeset tag; which is preferred usage nowdays according to osm.wiki/Key:source, hopefully that is fine.

Cheers and happy mapping!

Thanks, I'm aware, unfortunately that is not the only one.
I wish it was typo, but that is due to bug in Commons app (see https://github.com/commons-app/apps-android-commons/issues/5762) which seems to have lost a lot of my queued uploads. :(

As it looks there is no way of getting them back, now that I'm back on flat Internet I'm working of re-creating them with appropriate metadata, but that is slow work (lot of other backlog too). Hopefully I'll be able to catch them up in the next few weeks.
And thanks again for your vigilance!

Hi, just a note if you're not aware: when a (part of the) stream passes under the houses/roads, it should be marked osm.wiki/Tag:tunnel=culvert

Thanks for mapping!

Pozdrav,

vidim da si na Jadransku aveniju stavljao `bicycle=no` access tagove. Hvala na doprinosu!

"bicycle=no" tag se koristi isključivo za zakonske restrikcije kada je zabranjeno koristiti bicikl i nema biciklističke staze pored; vidi osm.wiki/Croatia/Ceste#Ozna%C4%8Davanje_biciklisti%C4%8Dke_infrastrukture

(Za poželjnost neke ceste za bicikliste može se koristiti class:bicycle=* tag umjesto bicycle=*; vidi navedeni wiki za detalje)

Koliko ja znam, Jadranska avenija nije imala takvih zakonskih zabrana (iako je definitivno ne bih preporučio kao idealnu prometnicu za bicikliste!)

Da li se nešto promijenilo, odnosno je li Jadranska avenija dobila znak zabrane prometa biciklima (B16 ili B17), ili oznaku brze ceste / ceste rezervirane isključivo za promet motornih vozila (C66 ili C64) ?

Unaprijed hvala na odgovoru!

Pozdrav,

vidim da si na željezničku postaju Đurđevac (osm.org/node/10889876902) stavio wikipedia/wikidata; ali su oni krivi - ne govore o željezničkoj postaji Đurđevac, nego o samom gradu Đurđevcu?

Mislim da bi to trebalo ili ispraviti na prave wikipedia/wikidata o Đurđevcu (i napraviti članke ako nedostaju), ili maknuti (jer su netočni), ili (možda) zamijeniti sa subject:wiki*

I've seen you added "add:country=IQ" tags; it that a typo? I.e. should those be "addr:country=IQ" instead?

see osm.wiki/ES:Key:divipola

Hi, thank you for your interest in Railways on OSM, David!

However, `railway=abandoned` does not seem correct for this specific old razed railway line "Samoborček" - vast majority of it is completely gone for decades and no visible traces remain (except for several abandoned bridges and similar, whose remains which I've surveyed and added Commons pictures for). I'll fix this changeset manually back to `railway=razed`, but please do take note of osm.wiki/Tag:railway=razed and linked pages for differences between unused/abandoned/razed, especially for railway lines which are already mapped. Thanks!

Also, could you in the future add sources used to the changeset comment? This one only mentions Croatia 2019-2020 Aerials, and on those Samoborček railway are missing, so that cannot be the source of railway data.