Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at osm.wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here?

Olá, notei que você usou aqui a etiqueta "acampamento= grama" não documentada. Estou tentando documentar os usos conhecidos em osm.wiki/Key:camp - você pode ajudar o que quis dizer aqui?

---

Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=grass" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at osm.wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here?

Hi, I've seen you've been adding tag "camp=yes" in Haiti in 2011, do you know what was the meaning of that tag? Is there documentation? I'm trying to document it on the wiki based on discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-document-tagging-mistakes-on-wiki-undocumented-duplicated-tags/97518

Hi, I've seen you've been adding tag "camp=yes" in Haiti in 2011, do you know what was the meaning of that tag? Is there documentation? I'm trying to document it on the wiki based on discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-document-tagging-mistakes-on-wiki-undocumented-duplicated-tags/97518

Hi, I've seen you've been adding tag "camp=yes" in Haiti in 2011, do you know what was the meaning of that tag? Is there documentation? I'm trying to document it on the wiki based on discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-document-tagging-mistakes-on-wiki-undocumented-duplicated-tags/97518

Hi, I've seen you've been adding tags like "camp=yes" in Haiti in 2011, do you know what was the meaning of that tag. Is there documentation? I'm trying to document it on the wiki based on discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-document-tagging-mistakes-on-wiki-undocumented-duplicated-tags/97518

discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name-lang-copy/57997

bilo je u toj diskusiji za sub-tag demanding_trail=* koji bi specificirao zasto tocno... No, nema veze, stavio sam abandoned:highway=path za sada; ako stave proposal budemo vidjeli onda...

This trail seems to have been deleted by @geomap6 in osm.org/changeset/101625624 before reading @valhikes explanation why it is real and shouldn't be deleted. Also, sadly, there doesn't seem to have been any followup on explanation.
Further comments and request for restoration can be found at link to other changeset above.

After reading osm.org/user/valhikes/diary/400998 and comments there, as well as any lack on response on this (and original changeset 90213462), I'm also of the opinion that this trail should not have been deleted.

Also for further reference, when asking a question on a changeset, it is customary to wait at least few days to give author a chance to respond (especially before deleting someone's work without any delay).

Does anybody object on reverting this changeset and restoring this trail to OSM map? @geomap6 ?

Da, ideja je iz https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/feature-proposal-voting-highway-scramble/5228 - Problem je što zapravo taj dio nije prohodan na bilo koji normalan način za regularnog pješaka, pa nije dobro da ih routeri šalju tamo. sac_scale je nažalost također neadekvatan, pogotovo jer se odnosi na planine. Da ima kuka i sajli, highway=via_ferrata bi bio sličan, ali nema. Razmišljao sam i potpuno ga pobrisati, ali postoje naznake da će se možda raditi šetnica. Možda alternativa highway=proposed+proposed=footway, ali ni to nije idealno jer nije službeno proposed još. Ili možda destroyed:highway=path (ali ni to nije idealno jer nije postojao prije pa da je sada destroyed, iako funkcionalno je takav praktički neupotrebljiv) ? Otvoren sam za prijedloge

If you made a photo, it would be cool to attach it via osm.wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons

Pozdrav,

vidim da je ova kuća u Kninu: osm.org/way/129444311/history označena imenom "Grgić Ante"? Na OSM-u ne upisujemo imena privatnih vlasnika kuća (radi privatnosti).
Ukoliko se pak radi o kući pretvorenoj u muzej (npr. kuća neke poznate osobe), ili o iznajmljivaču koji se oglašava pod tim imenom (npr. "Apartmani Grgić Ante") onda upisujemo "name=", ali moramo dodati i tag koji govori o čemu se točno radi (npr. "tourism=museum" ili "tourism=guest_house"

Hi, I see you have mapped some ways (e.g. w147187483, w940364164) as having "cycleway:right=separate"; however there is no separately mapped way right of them (only buildings). Do you know what happened there / what is correct state?
Thanks!

ref: https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/501

Hi, I've noticed you've marked this amenity=drinking_water as disused. However, I was there just few days earlier on 2022-06-26 and it was working fine (but it need to be pressed by foot to activate! see metal button on the lower right on wikimedia_commons picture on it! as shown in description=* tag)

related: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-do-youthmappers-teachosm/5501

related: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-do-youthmappers-teachosm/5501

related discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/shadowy-supertaggers/5543

Da, skužio sam poslije pa dopisao na Discourseu da je to zapravo kasniji Vespucci upload. Hvala!