Ej, vidim da si zamijenio tu naziv Antilope sa Mongolskim divljim konjem; ali wikidata/wikipedia su ostali stari? Također, osm.org/note/3340595 kaže da su tu i Turkmenski divlji magarci. Oni su se navodno skupa preselili (https://zoo.hr/kulani-i-divlji-mongolski-konj-u-novoj-nastambi/) pretpostavljam sa 100ak metara sjeveroistočno gdje su isto ucrtani?

Imamo li pouzdanih informacija da je željeznička stanica Ljubošina zbilja trajno zatvorena kako anonimni note osm.org/note/3547805 tvrdi? Za Melnice (osm.org/note/3476831) je ta informacija navodno netočna isto.

vratio sam wikipedia i wikidata entries.

Pozdrav, vidim da si ovdje pred 10ak mjeseci maknuo wikidata/wikipedia sa Novih dvora u Zaprešiću; radi li se o grešci ili nečem drugom? (u komentaru piše samo "wikidata")

Note: using Rijeka buildings WFS and #QGIS to prepare data for manual JOSM validation; check as on option for doing semi-manual imports (see also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-meetup-2023-11-09-online/105853/5)

Hi, thanks for checking! I'm not iD user so I have no idea of its capabilities (and which is operator oversight and which are errors due to iD idiosyncrasies). Even the best of us make random mistakes sometimes, I'm glad you can confirm it is not a workflow error.

I certainly didn't mean to imply you did not act in the good faith, sorry if my terseness came out that way; by "overaggressive changes" I simply meant "things were changed which should not have been changed". Thanks for contributing!

FYI, kada se wikimedia_commons mijenja iz URL-a u samo ime, treba se unescapeati taj URL... npr. osm.org/way/657313407/history gdje je bio "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Samobor%C4%8Dek_Samobor.jpg" se ne može samo pretvoriti u "File:Samobor%C4%8Dek_Samobor.jpg", nego u "File:Samoborček Samobor.jpg" - v.npr. https://maproulette.org/challenge/40799/task/184499141 i osm.org/changeset/143761533

overagressive wikidata/wikipedia mass-editing; e.g. osm.org/node/2295137953 is not about species:wikidata/wikipedia; instead it is an article/entry about that specific one tree of historic importance. I've fixed that one, would you be kind to check if there are other wrong (not manually verified) changes like that?

see also discussion at osm.org/changeset/127800153

(also see osm.org/changeset/133172833) -- I agree, we should not "lie for the renderer" (or for other data consumer, like OsmAnd), see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Here, I'd use osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix e.g. `abandoned:building=*`, `abandoned:operator=*` etc. (at least the first is rendered by OsmAnd, and if the others are not, one should request in OsmAnd that they support it instead of adding clearly incorrect tags like `operator=ex-JNA`.
Or one can use `wikidata=*` tag and add all related historical information there, so it will be shown in OsmAnd. One caring about abandoned features might also be interested in sister-project https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/

`smoothness=impassable` is popular and clear tag to mark that way is unpassable by any wheeled vehicle; see osm.wiki/Key:smoothness
There is also popular osm.wiki/Key:sac_scale to indicate how problematic it is for humans (and horses, I guess). In addition to previously mentioned tags, there is also some use of osm.wiki/Key:bicycle:physical to indicate physical possibility of using a bicycle (instead of legal restrictions), but it has some problems mentioned on their wiki, so I'd personally stick to the `smoothness=impassable` + `sac_scale=*`

v. također osm.org/changeset/140945275

ref.: people should probably discuss Liberland issue on talk page of osm.wiki/WikiProject_Liberland and update it based on consensus, so it can be easily linked on further edits

v. osm.org/changeset/128269542 na oba TK25 i HOK koliko vidim piše "Prpić-polje" a ne "Pripić polje" ? Koji je izvor za "Pripić", ili je to typo?

Reverting due to: not responding on discussion, obvious misspelling of "aerodrom", removal of wikidata.

osm.org/changeset/143518907

this was changed by consesus (and already fixed here), but for reference: osm.wiki/Croatia/Ceste#Neasfaltirane_razvrstane_ceste

(ispravka: u prvoj točki je trebalo biti osm.org/way/505779203 i osm.org/way/1217381936)

Pitanje: Je li "W&Trail run Požega" službena ruta (označena tablama / znakovima na terenu i sl) ili samo neka ruta od nekog događanja?

Pozdrav i dobrodošao!

Vidim da si dodao trail run Požega!

Par komentara:
- Prilikom dodavanja novih puteva (npr. iz .gpx datoteka) treba paziti da se iskoriste postojeći, a ne da se novi samo dodaju preko njih. Vidi problem npr. sa osm.org/way/1217381936 i osm.org/way/1217381936/history
- "name=*" tag na putevima (ways) služi za dodavanje službenih imena ulica i dr. Za dodavanje službenih (označenih) ruta koristimo poseban tip objekta naziva "relacija" u koji se dodaju postojeći putevi, v. osm.wiki/Relation:route
- Šumske/poljske puteve/staze obično označavamo kao highway=path a ne highway=footway (koji su više za uređene npr. popločane ili asfaltirane pješačke staze)

Možeš li to sam popraviti ili trebaš pomoć?

Ukoliko budeš imao bilo kakvih pitanja, slobodno pitaj na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/hr/72

LP,
Matija
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142931500

Hi and welcome! I see you changed wikidata to Q3511918 (from Q101859423, which you stripped of all data). Can you explain the purpose, i.e. why was such change made? Where the two wikidata items perhaps aliases (should one redirect to another)? Or something else?

building=* is only about architectural type of the building, not about its use (i.e. you could have building=observatory being used as amenity=pub). man_made=observatory (which you deleted) is its actual use.

So, can you please revert all of those "Why two tags where one may carry the info" changesets of yours?