Hi Mata

BrouterSuspects notified me about a broken road network. It complained about the highway you retagged to construction.

According to the wiki, this is discouraged in favor of setting conditional access restrictions. There is several advantages as cited below (apart from making quality assurance easier as one can silence brouter suspects if one knows an estimate end date for the restriction):

"Already existing features may be closed for a short time for temporary construction (e.g., old, damaged roads getting rebuilt or a road closed over a weekend to replace a sewer pipe). Don't use construction=* to tag such short-term closures; consider using conditional restrictions instead. As OSM data is often used offline [...]"
osm.wiki/Key:construction

"Section of road is closed for motor vehicles for a few months (for construction). Navigation after the end date should work even for maps created in the meantime. (See also temporary:*=*)"
osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions
see Traffic modes

In your case, I'd suggest to re-tag to something similar to:
motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (2023 Nov 16-2023 12 31)
source:motor_vehicle:conditional=https://www.rastatt.de/rathaus-und-politik/stadtverwaltung/pressemitteilungen/baumassnahme-ludwigringrauentaler-strasse-auf-der-zielgeraden

To be honest, I didn't get if the restriction applies to motor_vehicle:forward:conditional or backward or both :-)

Thanks for considering and happy mapping!
Metzor

Hi mrcmst,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hallo der König!

Brouter suspects hat angeschlagen, weil eine deiner Einbahnstraßen die falsche Richtung hatte. Das war die hier: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/154243397

Ich habe das mal geradegezogen und noch ein paar andere Sachen in der Gegend verbessert, falls du reinschauen willst:
osm.org/changeset/144441340

Bzw: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=144441340#20/47.62341/8.20764

Schönes Wochenende
Metzor

Dauert wohl noch bis 15.12, siehe https://www.verkehrsinfo-bw.de/baustelle?id=3852494_3852495_3852498

Access= no wegen Vollsperrung der K 4946 ab 08.05.2023 für die Dauer von rund einem Jahr
https://www.muellheim.de/aktuelle-meldungen/baustellen/

Hey rigilk3nt!

Du hast die Baustellen-Note gelöscht. Heißt das, die Baustelle ist weg, die Straße kann wieder befahren werden?

Dann müsste man auch noch das "motor_vehicle=no" löschen...
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1084736796

Viele Grüße
Metzor

Hallo Ess Bee!

Wieso änderst du gleichzeitig etwas in der Ukraine und in Deutschland?

Wieso fügst du die Anwohnerzahl von Egelssbach zu einem Node, bei dem das note-tag extra darum bittet, alle Daten an die Relation zu hängen?
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/240057491

Und wieso löscht du das highway tag von der Straße in der Ukraine?
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/240057491

Vermutlich war das keine Absicht? Dann hast du das Routing kaputt gemacht. Mit tertiary immerhin keine ganz unwichtige Straße.

Bitte korrigiere beide Punkte. Danke.

Viele Grüße
Metzor

Hi GeoRizzard,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

Your upload contains changes in Japan and Adak Island.

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi finnyboi,

Please do not use the specialised hotosm maps to edit in completely different areas.

Cambridge is not Rwanda ;-)
osm.org/way/793123497#map=0/53/0
osm.org/way/305523770#map=2/46.9/-2.8

First, the meta data of the changeset is really missleading. Second, look at the size of the orange bounding box...

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hey opendcc,

Ich hab das Einbahnstraßentag mal von der zweispurigen Bundesstraße entfernt, weil sich brouter suspects beschwert hat ;-)
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/39053841

Ich vermute du warst nur auf Durchreise?
In dem Dorf gäb's ja noch echt viel zu tun... Aber so aus der Ferne ohne jemand zum Rückfragen vor Ort traue ich mich da nicht ran...

Schöne Grüße
Metzor

Yes, this is possible:
1. Go to plugin settings
2. Cluck the OSM editing plugin
3. Go to OSM changes
4. Click on the three points, then you can upload each change separately

Hi Sarafat Islam,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hallo EtF vom Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie!

Schön, dass Du/ihr hier mitmacht :-)

In diesem Änderungssatz hast du - obwohl du bloß in Münzesheim was verbessern wolltest - leider auch einen Fußweg in Pforzheim verschoben, was einen hässlichen Knick in einem secondary highway erzeugte, siehe hier:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=143819428#20/48.89078/8.70945

Ich hab das repariert:
osm.org/changeset/143865518

Passiert jedem mal... Mir auch. Ich schaue immer, nicht zu viele Daten runter zu laden. Was man nicht hat, kann man auch nicht versehentlich verschieben...

Fröhliches Weitermappen!
Metzor

Vermutlich sollte mit dem CS die Baustelle gemappt werden:
https://rp.baden-wuerttemberg.de/fileadmin/RP-Internet/Freiburg/Abteilung_4/Strassenbaumassnahmen/B33_Allensbach_-_Konstanz/infoveranstaltung-05-23/Umbau_Kaltbrunner_Strasse.pdf

Geplantes Ende Juni 2024

Hi stpoepseldiver,

Please
have a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
osm.wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

Best regards
Metzor

Hallo googie!

Du hast auf eine Kreisstraße einen Poller gemapt:
osm.org/node/11308969547#map=19/48.10976/9.27298&layers=N

Das heißt, dort darf kein Auto mehr durch fahren.

Das halte ich auf einer Kreisstraße für unwahrscheinlich.

War das ein Versehen?

Viele Grüße
Metzor

Hi Olivia,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi volkerti,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also habe a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
osm.wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

Hi tinLoaf,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also habe a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
osm.wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

Hi o68,

Are you in contact with the local community about your changes? If not please get in touch.

There is two remarks from my side:
1) geografical size of your changeset, more at the end
2) disconnected footways:
For example those two (actually from two changesets):
osm.org/way/1219496731#map=17/-46.41952/168.37599
osm.org/way/1219496732
There is no crossing between the footpaths from those adjacent blocks. You need to map that as well. Otherways, anoying routes are suggested (how should the software know better?):
https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=15/-46.4199/168.3832/standard&lonlats=168.385429,-46.420211;168.383245,-46.418894&profile=hiking-mountain

Now more on 1):
You uploaded changes in New Zealand an the Netherlands.

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Bestregards
Metzor