Hey there,

my apologies, I was playing around with the maproulette plugin in JOSM and went through the tasks in numerical order. I didn't realize how spread out the tasks really were... however I still believe this is better than >30 small changesets each only containing a buildings or two, wouldn't you agree?

Also, the road piece you re-used had a lot of other tags which are now no longer correct, such as the total amount of lanes...

I told you this before, but *please* don't have both oneway roads going into and out of a roundabout mapped as the same OSM way. It breaks routers, all mapped public transport and much more.

Hi there, I noticed that you upload every building individually as a separate changeset. That kind of spams the server with very small changes, if you're going to add buildings you should consider adding multiple of them and then only uploading the changes once (personally I go for around 100 buildings per changeset).

Thanks for your mapping efforts though, keep it going!

Hey, I noticed that many if not all of the waterways you map actually go the wrong way (the OSM way is supposed to follow downstream and not up)... you should reverse the ways in JOSM (default hotkey is "R") before uploading your changes.

besides that, thanks for your work - the detailed waterways really makes this area stand out.

Both oneway streets going in and out of the roundabout are mapped as a single way. This breaks all the various routes that are mapped here. Could you please be a bit more careful in the future?

I know this is the way they printed it in the timetable, but data-quality wise it seems problematic to me to have this kind of duplication between the two directions of the bus route? Wouldn't it be better to either make this a roundtrip route or split it along a shared endpoint?

Die geänderte Node sollte nicht als public_transport=platform gemapped werden, da die Plattform schon als Fläche exisitiert (und auch von der Zuglinie genutzt wird usw.)
Gemäß osm.wiki/Railway_stations war diese node für den Bahnhof als solchen gedacht (aufgrund einer fehlenden Area für den Bahnhof hatte ich railway=halt und public_transport=station) in eine Node kombiniert, und nicht als Plattform

Hi,
Regarding osm.wiki/Key:area any closed line with barrier=* should always be regarded as a linear feature. Therefore, I was assuming that area=no was redundant here (that's also what Osmose QA assumed). Is there any other reference that I am overlooking?

Best regards,
Max