OpenStreetMap
http://map.project-osrm.org/1r9 The obvious route is to follow I-80 all the way. But instead it gets off and follows surface roads across Indiana.
Could it be avoiding barrier=toll_booth? The exit where it gets off (SR 66) is missing this. But why would it avoid toll roads without the user telling it to do so, and why wouldn’t it be using the toll=* tag on the ways?
讨论
iandees 于 2012年10月 2日 01:35 的评论
Looks like it’s fixed now.
NE2 于 2012年10月 2日 02:44 的评论
Yep, it’s fixed. I don’t see any recent edits along I-80 here, so the OSRM guys may have changed something.
dcp 于 2012年10月 3日 18:10 的评论
This is a very interesting development and it works! I tested it from Bonn, Germany to Croydon, England. It is very usable! What I noticed is that the were a number of purple overlays which seem to indicate that a OSM data error hinders the correct routing.
Is this so?
Should I, as a contributor, try to correct these “errors”?
NE2 于 2012年10月 3日 19:18 的评论
Where are you seeing purple overlays? The only purple I see is the admin boundaries and the alternate route when you hover over the B at the top right of the route description: http://osrm.at/1sb
dcp 于 2012年10月 4日 05:51 的评论
To NE2
I recalculated the route once again just now. No purple overlays. Unfortunately I did not take a snapshot of these purple overlays yesterday. It is just like your original post. NE2 registered something odd, iandees check and found nothing. Very strange indeed.
Anyway it is a very good tool and it should be accessible from the OSM Home Page, don’t you think?
butrus_butrus 于 2012年10月10日 22:09 的评论
You need to check the “small components” checkbox (where you choose the map) to see the purple overlays.
NE2 于 2012年10月10日 23:02 的评论
Huh? Whatever these ‘small components’ are supposed to be, they’re certainly not clustered around the routing.