This was already mapped [here](osm.org/node/12512826096) in the correct location. I'll move the non-duplicated tags over and delete this node.

You beat me to it! I just discovered these bike lanes on my own. They're nice!

Why the reversion? At least one of these edits (the one I'm looking at at the moment) was valid and helpful.

Yeah, sorry about that! I did realize a couple days after that it hadn't actually been completed yet, but I thought I saw them blocking things off for painting at that point so I just left it. Maybe that was just preparatory for the resurfacing though.

Well I'll be! I hadn't seen any indication of this plan on the site, but it does look like that could be a new stop location
https://www.metrolinx.com/en/projects-and-programs/kitchener-line-go-expansion

Source? I've never heard it called this.

Hi Matt,
Apologies for the brevity of my earlier message. I saw your edits coming in but didn't have time just then for more constructive criticism. Thanks Jarek for jumping in to fill that gap!

One way I'd suggest thinking about the namelessness here is that these are service roads, and most service roads actually don't have names. Private or semi-private driveways for example very rarely would be named. I wouldn't want to see osm.org/way/232723249 for example called "No Frills Driveway" or something like that. Where would it stop? Would the parking aisles have names too? "Easternmost North-South No Frills Parking Aisle" etc

Also, from the perspective of someone potentially using these names/descriptions to help navigate, I would think these would create confusion if anything. There's no indication of these names in physical reality, so if you were expecting that you might think you were in the wrong place. Better to have a direction like "turn left onto the unnamed alley" as an unnamed alley is what you would actually see.

Definitely not writing on behalf of the City by the way; the City has no say over what's right for OSM. Nor does Google Maps or any else for that matter.

Here's a good rundown of how to use the "name" tag: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
It appears there's actually a tag to indicate namelessness too osm.wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes which should probably be added to most of the city's alleys and might help to prevent some confusion in the future.

Best,
Nate

Please stop adding these names to alleys. These alleys do not have names. There are no signs and no one calls them by these names.

Just confirming; it looks like the conditional was from before the King Corridor rules, so would have been replaced by those.

I agree; I probably shouldn't have deleted that node, and I'm pretty sure I ended up keeping most other stops / platform areas (contra public_transport=stop_position's which I did consistently remove) in later edits.

They'll mostly be served by the bus replacements, so can be converted into bus stops while maintaining the history. In other cases, they'll probably still be marked by shelters or other infrastructure, even if unused and can use your proposed tagging.

I'll have a try at resurrecting that later this evening, if you don't beat me to it.

I say go for it! Especially if you have some actual familiarity with the street / area.

Most parts of Toronto could really use a lot more local attention. I know a ton of data was brought in by andrewpmk and others ages ago and much of it hasn't received too much tending since then. Lots of stuff is outdated or was imported and never fully verified against local knowledge.

Hmmm. I just took a look at the change history, and I don't think I was the one that added that tag. It looks like it was added ~8 years ago by andrewpmk.

osm.org/way/4663240/history

You may well be right; while not a decent place to ride a bike, you could presumably enter/exit at Transit Road before it becomes an expressway.

I've reverted this in changeset #129942938, restoring the mall's mostly demolished state. I think you may have traced it back in from outdated imagery. It's well on its way to being condos now.

Thanks for fixing this!

Do you have a source for the name "Anita's Field? I live right next to this and have never heard this name.

Apologies for stepping on any toes. My impression was that the regional municipality was going as "Halifax" and that the previous city boundary was now defunct as an administrative boundary, but kept around perhaps as a statistical unit, similar to Old Toronto: osm.org/relation/2989349

Halifax.ca seems to indicate that this is the case, as does the English Wikipedia page for "Halifax, Nova Scotia": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax,_Nova_Scotia

A search for "Halifax" in Nominatim currently returns the historical city boundary, not the current amalgamated boundary. Is that the desired outcome?

There's no place called "Halifax"?
Wikipedia and Wikidata disagree. I'm sure it has a longer official name, but do people actually not just call it "Halifax"?

I've reverted this changeset in changeset 114540378. I'm not sure what all changes were attempted here, but it left both India and Pakistan border relations in an invalid state. There was an open gap in their shared border. I'm not familiar enough with the region to assess the the quality of other edits so I thought it was safest to revert rather than manually bridging the gap myself.

See also note: osm.org/note/2805986

I reverted this changeset because it broke the city's boundary relation.