Apologies, I should have mentioned it in the changeset. The areas did not give additional information in terms of tags nor geometry, as they were all linear and features such as turning circles are already mapped by nodes. Would you like me to update the road information around the town as compensation?

These were added over 10 years ago, incomplete and no different from the ways already representing the roads around Ingatestone.

Signage does not denote road numbers, official documents do. I'm not familiar with the numbering in Manchester so I can't comment on that. The destination and destination:ref tags here already contain the necessary information given by road signs, including the refs M8 and (M73).

Hi, only C-roads and U-roads in the UK should really use the tag highway_authority_ref. Regardless of what the sign says, the ref as stated in the reference I tagged on the ways is A8(M). Signage was probably only changed for simplicity, however the ref hasn't. There's likely lots of examples of this, whether intentional or whether down to botched/incorrect signage. As for the tagging, I feel highway=motorway is more appropriate, as the A8(M) has it's own number outright.

Please tidy up your edits, not just delete a road segment and be done

What data did you use for these names?

That isn't a correct tag for a speed limit. I thought I did add a note saying "Temporary speed limit due to roadworks" but I must have forgot or it didn't add properly. I'll add it now.

Hmm, still all A-roads are listed as "Principal Road - A" on that map. West Sussex CC doesn't seem to know what a primary route is, maybe something similar here? I'd be surprised if there's just a gap here in the primary status.

Can you send a link to the source for this? The Herts CC highways gazetteer map only shows "Principal Road - A" for primary and non-primary roads

My apologies, occasionally iD does strange things with my laptop and doesn't undo even though it looks like it has

Unadopted roads do not continue the speed limits of adopted roads, and so I removed the speed limits except those erected by road owners themselves (e.g. 10 mph). I retained (or meant to until you pointed out I forgot) the limits around the old military base because of this. I've not gone near any shop names or fixmes here so not sure what you mean by that.

I would argue the width doesn't mean this should be marked as a pedestrian street. The vehicles you describe can also use the paths in parks, yet these are not pedestrian streets.

Oh I must have forgot to update that. I'll add them back

Are you sure the maxheight is 12'3"? I'm pretty sure it's at least default here

Well perhaps enquire if there is a TRO and if not remove the restriction

Not sure if a TRO is used, however as prohibition of cycling signs are used on all approaches, I marked it as such.

Yes, it is banned. I saw signs on my recent trip to Wales. The roadworks between J12 and J13 to bring the dual carriageway there up to standard resulted in these yellow signs going up banning cyclists from J11 to J15. Can't quite make it out, but here it is underneath the brown sign: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.2013595&lng=-4.11394&z=17&pKey=422956639351622&focus=photo&x=0.2679870765487419&y=0.45754226762179084&zoom=0.9582839116289317

But GB:nsl_single should imply different speed limits for different parts of the UK, e.g. trucks where it's 40 mph in Scotland and 50 mph in England

Now the A5 has a gap in it. Are you sure this is right?

Please note when changing speed limits in Wales to the new 20 mph limit, you need to also change the maxspeed:type=* tags. If the road in Wales is lit and has a 20 mph speed limit, then add the tag maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_restricted. If the road is not lit and has a 20 mph speed limit then add the tag maxspeed:type=sign. Speed limits of 30 mph should now always have the tag maxspeed:type=sign