Die Änderungen wurden auf Basis von neuen Mapillary-Bildern durchgeführt und nicht - wie von StreetComplete behauptet - per Besuch vor Ort.

Die Änderungen wurden auf Basis von neuen Mapillary-Bildern durchgeführt und nicht - wie von StreetComplete behauptet - per Besuch vor Ort.

Die Änderungen wurden auf Basis von neuen Mapillary-Bildern durchgeführt und nicht - wie von StreetComplete behauptet - per Besuch vor Ort.

Rückgängig gemacht, da sic der Gebäudetyp nicht durch Mapillary sicher erkennen lässt. osm.org/changeset/66067832

Dein Änderungssatzkommentar passt nicht zu deinen eigentlichen Änderungen. Passt das so?

VlG Nmxosm

Hello serg-ivanov,

your changeset adds advertisement that isn't supposed to be a part of OpenStreetMap (osm.wiki/Introduction_to_OSM_for_Business_Users#What_Data_Belongs_in_OpenStreetMap.3F_What_Not.3F). Please remove this and wait with further edits until this is resolved.

You furthermore seem to edit as part of an organised editing. Please mark them as such if applicable. (https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/1/13/Organised_editing_guidelines_version_20180908.pdf)

Thanks.
Nmxosm

Hello serg-ivanov,

your changeset changes the phone number to a not recommended format (osm.wiki/Key:phone). Please revert this and wait with further edits until this is resolved.

You furthermore seem to edit as part of an organised editing. Please mark them as such if applicable. (https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/1/13/Organised_editing_guidelines_version_20180908.pdf)

Thanks.
Nmxosm

Hello serg-ivanov,

your changeset removes seemingly valid data. This is usually considered vandalism (osm.wiki/Vandalism). Please revert this and wait with further edits until this is resolved.

You furthermore seem to edit as part of an organised editing. Please mark them as such if applicable. (https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/1/13/Organised_editing_guidelines_version_20180908.pdf)

Thanks.
Nmxosm

Hello serg-ivanov,

your changeset adds advertisement that isn't supposed to be a part of OpenStreetMap (osm.wiki/Introduction_to_OSM_for_Business_Users#What_Data_Belongs_in_OpenStreetMap.3F_What_Not.3F). Please remove this and wait with further edits until this is resolved.

You furthermore seem to edit as part of an organised editing. Please mark them as such if applicable. (https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/1/13/Organised_editing_guidelines_version_20180908.pdf)

Thanks.
Nmxosm

Hello serg-ivanov,

your changeset adds an address to a node that is part of two streets. This is not where an address usually belongs to. Please remove this and wait with further edits until this is resolved.

You furthermore seem to edit as part of an organised editing. Please mark them as such if applicable. (https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/1/13/Organised_editing_guidelines_version_20180908.pdf)

Thanks.
Nmxosm

Hello serg-ivanov,

your changeset adds advertisement that isn't supposed to be a part of OpenStreetMap (osm.wiki/Introduction_to_OSM_for_Business_Users#What_Data_Belongs_in_OpenStreetMap.3F_What_Not.3F). Please remove this and wait with further edits until this is resolved.

You furthermore seem to edit as part of an organised editing. Please mark them as such if applicable. (https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/1/13/Organised_editing_guidelines_version_20180908.pdf)

Thanks.
Nmxosm

"Stromtankstelle" würde ich normalerweise eine Beschreibung erwarten und kein Name im OSM-Sinn (osm.wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name). Ist das wirklich ein Name?

VlG Nmxosm

Hi rorym,

do you plan to just wait for this to be forgotten? There are a lot of things now presented as broken and there hasn't been any reaction on that yet.

Greetings
Nmxosm

Ich habe das jetzt mit osm.org/changeset/65413888 angepasst.

VlG Nmxosm

Hallo Grauer Elefant,

die Station sollte eigentlich auch Teil der Gleiswege und Teil der Routenrelationen werden.

VlG Nmxosm

Würden Sie bitte beschreibende Changesetkommentare verwenden? Das hilft anderen Beitragenden, Ihre Änderungen besser nachzuvollziehen. Siehe auch: osm.wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz
Vielen Dank.

Could you please use descriptive changeset comments? This helps other contributors to understand your changes more easily. See also: osm.wiki/Changeset
Thank you

You're right. These are other problems. But just because bigger problems do exist, smaller problems still should be solved if this can be done easily. In OSM the mass of data is that vast anyway that we can't fix everything (my assumption).

I can't see, why you should add redundant data. From computer science perspective it brings lots of issues along (especially consistency). What, if lgbtq=primary doesn't apply any more, a mapper removes that, but leaves [rainbow flag]=primary? Although for almost all of us OSM is a sparetime project / hobby, I think it is far from meaningless. Therefore we should handle such problems with care. There are enough inconsistencies in the database anywhere. Some other mappers seem to think this way too: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element#Tag_data

In a nutshell: I strongly oppose this tagging.

With kind regards
Nmxosm

Ich habe die entsprechenden Wege jetzt mit osm.org/changeset/65230258 entfernt.

VlG Nmxosm

Ist die dieser Änderungssatz bei den Korrekturen untergegangen?

VlG Nmxosm