Hey KindredCoda... Thanks for adding the GGB building structure! I'm wondering if a type=building relation would be better here. Then all the parts would be role=part. See osm.wiki/Relation:building
The way it is now as a multipolygon and all the parts that overlap each other as role=outer doesn't really work very well because "Generally, the multipolygon relation can be used to build multipolygons in compliance with the OGC Simple Feature standard (Graphical examples of OGC validity). Anything that is not a valid multipolygon according to this standard (e.g., polygons with intersecting rings) should also be considered an invalid multipolygon relation, with the notable exception of touching inner rings (see below)."

Just a thought - I don't think it would be hard to convert it - you've done all the hard work already.

This caused many duplicate houses. Please verify that your conflation process does not lead to duplicate buildings.

Hello CAT Fijn, please don't add the address of a house to the name. residential houses generally don't have names. add an address if you would like to. Also, please don't add buildings on top of other buildings.

adi04, you seem to be duplicating buildings that are already on the map. I see you are relatively new, so this is probably a mistake. I'm deleting the duplicates... but please review the wiki about adding buildings to the map. No need to duplicate geometries.

This is obvious fantasy and not based on reality. Please revert this changeset.

Why did you make buildings into diamond shapes? See w531354067

It looks like this edit broke r13737951. Can you please take a look and see if you can fix it? I'm seeing that this multipolygon has an unclosed part.

Just wondering... are the "names" that you are assigning actually addresses? Or are they actually the name of the buildings? Just wondering if these should actually be address = <blah> ?

Botirjon2020 - these are not houses. These appear to be "place=plot". Please correct them. Building=* is meant to trace the outline of a structure - not a plot boundary.

Hello Botirjon2020. I wanted to just point out that "buildings" are meant to trace the outline of a building. They are not meant as property boundaries. It looks like you are drawing property boundaries. I think you want to you place=plot (osm.wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot) instead of building=yes

Привет, Botirjon2020. Я просто хотел отметить, что "buildings" предназначены для обозначения контура здания. Они не предназначены для обозначения границ собственности. Похоже, вы рисуете границы собственности. Я думаю, вы хотите использовать "place=plot" (osm.wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot) вместо "building=yes"

Ooops. meant to say that I removed a bunch of duplicate nodes.

Sorry, my fault. The initial issue was that the two ways intersected without a shared node. I incorrectly made other changes - my apologies.

It had a self intersection. So I converted it to a relation with two members. One for outer and one for inner.

It looks like the Changeset duplicated many of the buildings created in changeset 159543060. Can you please revert these duplicate buildings? Also, I'm wondering how this happened as you are using Rapid and Rapid should show you where buildings have already been mapped.

This seems to be an import of buildings that completely duplicated your change set 159314877. Can you please revert this to eliminate the ~1400 duplicate buildings? I see that you only have 15 edits so far so this is probably a mistake, but imports generally need to be discussed with the OSM community. If you need help reverting please let me know or reach out to the OSM community.

It looks like this changeset added a number of duplicate buildings. For example 1339756548 and 1339759083. I'd removed 1339759083 and a number of other duplicates, but I just wanted to point it out in case there might be a problem with your process that caused the duplicates.

Many of these buildings are realy not good polygons. also some of them are invalid: see the "warnings:close_nodes:vertices" warning on this changeset. Please try to create more acurate and valid buildings in the future.

Tera, can you please make sure that you are closing all the buildings you create? I've seen a few buildings in this area that you created that are not valid building shapes. I'm specifically looking at w1337172885 right now and I'll fix it, but please look into the process that you are using that may be creating multiple nodes for a building. One hint that there is a problem is the "warning:close_nodes:vertices" that ID should have given you when you tried to commit this change. I would also say that if you are using ID you may want to use the "q" key to square houses as you go - this will not only square the house but it will indicate where you may have bad building polygons.

Thanks for your contribution!! Happy mapping

Hello, would it be possible to map these bicycle routes using relations that relate a number of road sections to a bicycle path? We generally don't like to map ways on top of other ways.

Hola, ¿sería posible mapear estas rutas ciclistas utilizando relaciones que relacionen un número de tramos de carretera con un carril bici? Generalmente no nos gusta mapear caminos encima de otros caminos.

This changeset duplicated a lot of buildings please try to make sure you are not adding duplicates from 158667689.