Why? US 67 isn’t being officially truncated.

Hi. I noticed you opened up the interchange between I 69 and I 465. Local sources state that the interchange is due to open next month; in August. Are there any verifiable sources proving this interchange has already opened to traffic? If not, please revert the premature edits. Thanks.

I apologize for the incorrect edits. I made some erroneous assumptions about the area as a local. I will be more diligent about relying on sources in the future. Thank you for reverting my erroneous edit.

I sourced them from this video here:

https://youtu.be/hA54-B8uiUE?si=Ts9wFt-PQGxckH1H

Done. Please feel free to check if there are still any mistakes. Again, thank you so much for pointing this out.

My apologies. Thanks for the information. I will correct my mistake.

Hi Will,

I didn’t really have any specific rationale for removing “Metro” from the relation names, I just personally thought about harmonizing their names with the actual line names themselves. If it’s better for them to have “Metro” in the relation names, then I wholeheartedly support that decision and can add it back to the relation names.

Thank you!
Scarlett

My apologies, I was mistaken. Thanks for letting me know!

Hi! Thanks for the comment! My sincere apologies for the mistakes and unsourced edits. Please feel free to revert/change them.

Hi, thanks for the comment! I've changed the tags.

Hi! Thanks for the comment, I removed the parentheticals.

Thanks for the comment! I've hopefully fixed the issue now.

Hi! Apologies for my incorrect changeset. I genuinely didn't realize that the interchange was only partially open to traffic. I was under the impression that the entire interchange was open to traffic because the news report I read never explicitly mentioned that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention and reverting it!