I don't recall, but you could use a kinder tone in your comments.

My mistake was missing this nuance: "It is physically and operationally separate from the rest of the hospital, and known as Nuffield Health at St Bartholomew's Hospital" and therefore tagging it on the incorrect feature. Do with that what you will, thank you for your feedback.

osm.org/changeset/152288391

Apologies, I thought I replaced the name. I have fixed it now.

Thanks for the heads up! I will check our team's edits for this. We generally use https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ or the opening hours plugin in JOSM. The JOSM validator doesn't seem to pick up that a semi-colon at the end isn't needed, etc.

Out of interest where is it triggering warnings?

Ah I see, I must have missed a few of those when I was looking at the buildings.
So I downloaded the Microsoft Building footprints for the entire state and split out the file into counties, from there I downloaded a layer of all the current buildings, and then in QGIS I ran some geoprocessing so wouldn't duplicate what already existed - this is where the tiny slithers and segments came into it. I apologise for missing those. I also was not meant to have the edit related to this account, it should have been my person account.
I can add in a step to avoid this in future, I can also assess this changeset and the one you mentioned. Unless you are willing to share the detections, in which case I would be more than happy to look through them so you don't have to correct my edits.
Thank you for catching this, I really appreciate you taking the time to respond.

@BigKev97 Good catch, when the area was changed to a building it also changed the type to a multipolygon, I just changed the type to boundary and set the boundary to administrative.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It looks like the building=yes tag was added to an administrative boundary in this edit. An administrative boundary is recognized by governments and is purely an outline. Buildings within the boundary should be tagged individually by tracing the building footprint from aerial imagery. To tag areas of land use within an administrative boundary you can refer to the extensive information available in the OSM wiki: osm.wiki/Land_use

For now, I have removed the building-yes tag from this boundary feature. If you are unsure or have any questions don't hesitate to reach out, ask for help on the OSM community forums or refer to the wiki. https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Happy Mapping!

All of these relations are still referenced in the wiki: osm.wiki/Berlin/Transportation#Tram_lines

Are you able to update the wiki?

Hello, the wikidata ID added to this feature is for a different location, would you mind reviewing it?

The name of Hale Malama Museum Collections Storage Facility (339070746, v2) isn't present in the source, and a storage facility doesn't sound like a museum, do you have any insight on the sources used and what the name of the building is?

Hello,
Thisis correcting the tag as mentioned in the OpenStreetMap Wiki. Please see: osm.wiki/Key:historic#Possible_tagging_mistakes
The historic key describes what something was, or if it has historic significance. The exhibit tag references the nature of the object on display - i.e. historic=anchor, exhibit=historic would be most appropriate given the information on the wiki. Thank you for your feedback.