Peter Newman's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
105998331 | about 3 years ago | Did you split some roads in two either side of central reservations in this changeset? It looks like you left the pavement/sidewalk tagging as it was, so it said both bits of pavement are on one side of the road, rather than there being one on each side of the now two single carriageways. |
109478972 | about 3 years ago | Ah yes, sorry, my mistake. |
109478972 | about 3 years ago | Did you split some roads in two either side of central reservations in this changeset? It looks like you left the pavement/sidewalk tagging as it was, so it now says both bits of pavement are on one side of the road, rather than there being one on each side. |
119767709 | over 3 years ago | You might want to also add this additional tagging: osm.wiki/Tag:club%3Dscout |
106429713 | over 3 years ago | Hi MacLondon, You've reverted the position of osm.org/node/469769908 back to it's old (now incorrect) position; please could you move it back? It should be outside the Calthorpe Project at the moment. |
77134639 | over 3 years ago | Makes sense thanks and thanks for fixing it! |
77134639 | over 3 years ago | Hi spiregrain, Thought I'd comment here in case I've missed something obvious. This changeset appears to introduce a second duplicate way at number 53:
Versus the older:
Can your one just be deleted? Or do we want to turn the restaurant into a node like some of the others? |
108175109 | over 3 years ago | Hi GME squeeze, Is this really a glacier (as in a large ice flow), rather than an ice cream shop? See also the discussion in: osm.org/changeset/113546359 |
113546359 | over 3 years ago | Yes, that's why I left a note on the node and caused this whole discussion; in French glacée is ice, so I assume that's where the confusion has come from, unless there really is a tiny glacier within a shop on the French coast... |
113546359 | over 3 years ago | Yeah sorry, I spotted ( osm.org/node/8929448769 ) which looks like a clear error when looking for the one I was trying to add and thought it was worth flagging it before I forgot about it. Apologies for the spam. |
104782599 | about 4 years ago | Hi Dan, I went and confirmed collection times and took a picture (which will be there until the note is closed):
Fixed in:
I assume you mean both apertures? Unfortunately as we didn't have a note I forgot to check that, but looking at the photo, the left one is clearly 1001 which would normally be the lower number I think. |
104782599 | about 4 years ago | Hi Dan, Well spotted. Although I think you mean I've actually entered 07:00/13:15 i.e. 12 hours out on the weekday side. There's a tiny chance there is a bug in StreetComplete 32.0-alpha2, but only in the resurvey part, as I've successfully entered 24 hour times for a new postbox with that version. Realistically it's more likely given the very wet conditions when I surveyed it, either my finger slipped or the phone misregistered it. Feel free to revert the changeset, or I'll try and get back that way fairly soon to resurvey it more carefully, but I imagine it's my error looking at the history. SC asks you to enter it in full during the resurvey, hence the potential introduction of errors. |
87850400 | about 4 years ago | Hi @zorque, I see you did an update to osm.org/way/345630059 in this changeset. It's currently tagged as:
I assume since you made it vacant it's no longer a restaurant and this should be removed? |
103153280 | over 4 years ago | Hi @ThLwpstr have you checked it's been renamed again and that map isn't just out of date (also I assume the copyright is okay for taking their data)? Only their website says it's still Heathcote Street:
Also the location seems to have migrated South again, last week there was definitely a bus stop pole near to osm.org/#map=19/51.52679/-0.11805 See osm.org/note/2292485 (although the shelter has now gone). It might be @harg that migrated it's position, I'm not quite sure. |
103157165 | over 4 years ago | That's as maybe, but it's still far easier to use than trawling through the wiki which is often contradictory at best. The presets have been spun out into a separate repo ( https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema ), I suspect for precisely that reason so the developers can concentrate on actually writing code and not arguing about tags. TBH I only added the building as I wanted to add a defibrillator ( osm.org/node/8641874348 ) which was on the edge of the building so thought I should add the whole thing. |
103157165 | over 4 years ago | Apologies @DaveF , I was using iD which didn't seem to have a preset, but I've now found that it exists but it's just not searchable:
|
95833243 | over 4 years ago | Good luck, happy to give some input if it helps when you've opened the issue. |
95833243 | over 4 years ago | Hi @SK53, I wonder if a lot of these were done by StreetComplete. I don't know the logic behind it, but you could try raising an issue and you might be able to get the value added automatically if it's normal UK tagging:
|
95574151 | over 4 years ago | Yeah I should be able to do that @SK53. Do you want to leave a note and then I'll actually see it in the app and I might remember! |
92534776 | almost 5 years ago | For info this isn't actually correct, I got caught out on this too. building=terrace is for when you've mapped the whole run of terrace as one building:
@harg's building=residential or better yet building=house:
|