Hi Colin,
Thanks for responding so promptly and cooperatively. I now understand that the way that I am concerned about should not have been included in the changeset in NL, but that you still consider it to be a valid object.
It seems that I did not adequately explain my concern, so I will try again:
My concern was that osm.org/way/356789767 was tagged as: “landuse=forest” (despite being a linear way and not an enclosed area) and “name=Wellsfoot Island” (despite it being in Milton Keynes and a G**gle search suggesting that Wellsfoot Island is on Dartmoor.
I see that you have since edited it again to revert it to being a section of admin boundary. Thank you for your help.
Cheers,
Peter

osm.org/way/356789767, which was part of this changeset appears to be misplaced in Milton Keynes, UK. It seems to be part of a change in the Netherlands. I propose to delete it, unless I hear that you have reason to keep it there.

No problem. Have a good day.