OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
73822566 almost 6 years ago

Hi There,

It appears you have assigned a parish wikidata entry to this administrative boundary. Can you please be more careful in the future?

73241080 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

I've just come across this relation which appears to be a duplicate of osm.org/relation/3104327

73487253 almost 6 years ago

But if there is no relation, how are the parts related to the the main perimeter building?

I feel what you're suggesting goes against what's described here on osm.wiki/Simple_3D_buildings

73487253 almost 6 years ago

Going by the wiki it's suggested that you do not put anything on any relationship members if they are common across all members, then you put it on the relation. So all children inherit the properties.

The 'multipolygon' type I wasn't certain about, I guess the alternative would be 'building'?

I'll go ahead and fix the 'building:part=retail' tags, you're right, I was being lazy here :P

69337188 almost 6 years ago

Hey there,

It appears you have attached a whole bunch of incorrect Wikidata tags to suburbs etc that are parishes, and not the actual suburb Wikidata entry.
Can you please be more careful in the future when using this tool?

Thanks in advance.

69223889 about 6 years ago

Any chance you can undo this? I don't think these buildings were physically connected, from memory.

53137878 over 6 years ago

Hey I just wanted to let you know that it looks like you accidentally created a duplicate of Boost Juice at this location. Can you please be more careful in the future when deleting, modifying and creating new locations?

65720440 over 6 years ago

Thanks for doing this, i'm looking at these issues within Victoria myself.

39163969 over 6 years ago

Hey there,
Just some advice for marking up locations like you have for HEMCO Industries, you've effectively created multiples of the same place, when in fact that all four buildings equate to the one location.

Next time you come across something like this again, just make the areas for each of the buildings, but do not mark them up as buildings, instead add a multipolygon relation and then with that relation assign all the details you would normally to the individual buildings.

I've gone ahead and fixed this for you if you wanna take a look on how it should be done.

Again, if you have any queries, let me know. But the first point of reference would be the wiki or the help site, failing that reddit or any number of chatrooms that are set up.

Remember, it never hurts to double check on how you should go about doing something if you're unsure.

56043624 over 6 years ago

Hey There,
It looks like you've made the same place in triplicate. I've gone ahead and removed the superfluous data, so now there's only one instance of the fire station (as there is in reality).

54357826 over 6 years ago

Hi There,
I've found a place you've put on the map "Darrium"? I can't seem to find any information about this place, is this legitimate?

63845570 over 6 years ago

Hey there, I found around 30 places you've assigned the wrong wikidata id. Can you please be more careful in the future?

Looks like you've assigned either the parish, or the defunct city to these suburbs.

63845570 over 6 years ago

Hey there, just wanted to let you know Box Hill was assigned the wrong wikidata id.

63844312 over 6 years ago

Hey there,
Just a heads up, it looks like you attached the wrong wikidata ID to this suburb. I've gone ahead and fixed this.

50671062 over 6 years ago

Hi There,
I don't think this is quite appropriate to be tagging this as a residential area as this name is unofficial, and going by the Wikipedia article, it was the name of the estate?

59212363 over 6 years ago

Hey there, it looks like you've created a duplicate Woolworths at southern cross, please be more careful in the future.

15867898 over 6 years ago

Hi There,
I've fixed up another typo here, WIng, rather than Wing. Please be more careful in the future.

22746627 over 6 years ago

Hi there,
Please be careful with spelling of locations.
I've gone ahead and fixed this for you. You had Laritt, rather than Larritt.

22746606 over 6 years ago

Hi there,
It's generally frowned upon to combine names within the one tag. Also there's differing quotes used in the title.
I've gone ahead and put Doll's House in the alt_name field.
And found a source online for this name.
https://www.bgs.vic.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/BG_Boomalacka_Issue115_Final_LR.pdf

If you're looking for more details on what tag to use when name, please take a read of osm.wiki/Names#Key_Variations

15769215 over 6 years ago

Hi there,
I just had a look at your Woodbridge relation, and it appears that it was incorrectly inputted. I've gone ahead and fixed it for you.
If you're at all interested in creating "donuts" such as this in the future, take a look at osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon