Logotipo do OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

tourism=attraction

Publicado por Pieren o 25 de Setembro de 2013 en English.

In the (long) list of tags I don’t like, I should add the “tourism=attraction”. I find it sometimes on elements with just a name (a library in my case). It is just used to highlight something on the map when people are too lazy to search the right tag (amenity=library) -> “tourism=attraction” is a tag for the renderer and more important, is almost always subjective.

Icona de correo electrónico Icona de Bluesky Icona de Facebook Icona de LinkedIn Icona de Mastodon Icona de Telegram Icona de X

Parola

Comentario de compdude no 25 de Setembro de 2013 ás 17:03

I agree with you that it is subjective. One could easily argue that a library could be tagged as tourism=attraction, especially if it has a unique design or if it’s a historic landmark. For example, the Central Library in Downtown Seattle is quite an attraction because of its unique design. Nevertheless, tagging a library as tourism=attraction is still a misuse of the tag.

Comentario de malenki no 18 de Outubro de 2013 ás 15:17

You shouldn’t dislike the tag but the people misusing it.
And you shouldn’t only dislike them but tell them how to do better. ;)

Inicia sesión para deixar un comentario