Express your opinion about the relation “type=person” here:
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:person#Voting
This is also questioning the limits of the project (what has to go into OSM and what not)
Express your opinion about the relation “type=person” here:
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:person#Voting
This is also questioning the limits of the project (what has to go into OSM and what not)
Дийцар
Коммент Warin61 14 December 2014 03:04
No request for comments .. went straight to voting.. Little to no geographic (map) data .. OSM = OS Map as in Map.
I’d be in opposition to this re-proposal.