I will try to retag this and see if the game picks up on that. Perhaps some of the mtb:* tags could be useful here, too - osm.wiki/Key:mtb:scale

That said, "I will make the map less accurate for everyone else, so that one specific app works a bit better for me" is...not great. Let's try to find another solution that doesn't retag half of Prague as bicycle=no when you mean "my bike is not offroad"

re: pedestrian - this reconstruction is not started yet, as mapped in the proposed=pedestrian tag, i.e.: this is expected to become pedestrian in the future (was supposed to be done already, but now the date is uncertain). "Track" is an appropriate tagging for now - tagging the track as smoothness=horrible (which means "heavy-duty off road vehicles" and implies "unfit for cars, rollerblades, baby carts or bikes") would IMHO be far closer to reality. I don't know if your game on wandrer.earth reads this tag, though.

Sorry, you are still tagging "bicycles FORBIDDEN by law or traffic sign" here, but you mean "not suitable for me on bike".
osm.wiki/Tag:bicycle=no

Perhaps you are looking for the "smoothness" tag here? osm.wiki/Key:smoothness

a omylem jsem zahrnul i předchozí CS, což byly úpravy Bubenskýho nábřeží.

Diky, tyhle dva kousky mi utekly v predchozim editu.

Aha, díky, to s tím layerem mi nedošlo. Sleduješ to přes nějaký nástroj typu keepright?

Kruhák vrácen z deklu od kanálu (?!?) zpátky na kruhák: osm.org/changeset/129609939

Líbit se mi tam nemusí, ale mapujme svět, jak opravdu vypadá, ne jaký bychom ho chtěli.

Díky.

Vot technika! Tak to je mazec, to by mě nenapadlo, že tohle budou osvětlovat:) Díky za doplnění.

Ahoj, tahle pěšina je osvětlená nějak na časovač, nebo na detekci? Totiž když jsem tam šel minule, byla tam tma jak v pytli, ani jsem žádný světla neviděl, ani zhaslý...nepřipadlo mi, že by to z ulice nebo z parku bylo osvětlené dost na lit=yes...

It is better, thank you. I have removed the extra tags: what's in "access" is valid for everyone, so it's not necessary to add extra tags, if the permissions are the same. See e.g. the current version of osm.org/way/49493386

"you can go there with car or bike, if you have things to do there" would be "vehicle=destination" btw

Was there a change in signage? Last I checked, there was "no vehicles at all, except those with explicit permission", which was okay with the previous tagging access=private, foot=yes (or just motor_vehicle=private would have been fine).

access=permissive is "anyone can go here, but owner might close access", motor_vehicle=yes is "open for any motor vehicle, no conditions", and "horse=no" is "horses explicitly forbidden". This seems to be tagged completely at random now.

Hm, koukám jsem si nezavřel předchozím changeset v Běchovicích :(
Ten se původně jmenoval "Běchovice - cesty, pěšiny"

Please do not delete buildings that were mapped correctly: the single node that you added instead was not an adequate replacement. Reverted in osm.org/changeset/129316513

průjezd z Ronkovy na jih opět zahrazen Zákazem vjezdu motorových vozidel, na sever průjezdné.

Ta vlečka je hodně bývalá...má smysl ji znovu mapovat (a to konkrétně tenhle kousek, i bez pokračování do dvacet+ let neexistujícího ČKD), i když po ní už vůbec nic nezbylo? (V historii to kdysi zmapovaný bylo, tuším že tady, ale už tehdy to byl jen pozůstatek vlečky, provoz skončil cca 1998: osm.org/changeset/11258851 )

Thanks. I added oneway=no for explicitness.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/128882957 : original tagging was scarce but correct, this is a department located in a different building from the central office.

Main building: osm.org/way/34113022

Planning department:
osm.org/node/367763896

Hello, that was incorrect and broke routing in central Prague: The road has been two-way for half a year now.

Reverted the remaining part of your edit in osm.org/changeset/128878619