I tried to make things right again using the reverter plugin for JOSM and doing a partial upload of that way.

I started by downloading a skeleton with the public transport route relations of Aachen. I started doing validation on it and fixed some errors.
Those bus routes seem to go far.
I did notice some ways were missing, but I hadn't realised I was the one who deleted it. Sorry about that. When I had conflicts, I resolved them in favour of the last user, then restarted validation, until most errors were resolved.

Now I start to understand what went wrong. I did a search to find all the roundabouts that were members of modified bus route relations to add them to the todo list. Because I wanted to test the split roundabout functionality of PT_Assistant. I must have moved them inadvertently while they were still selected.

I'll do what I can to fix this tomorrow.

I'm not sure how that went so wrong. I restored the relation and fixed it where it was broken: osm.org/relation/7372053/history Sorry for the trouble.

Je hebt waarschijnlijk gelijk. Ik zal voor die regio de fietsrelaties ook nakijken. De plugin moet deze zomer ook uitgebreid worden, zodat de mapper te weten komt dat dit gebeurt.
Mijn excuses hiervoor.
Jo

Thanks! Now they won't be reported by JOSM's validator rules coming from PT_Assistant plugin anymore!

I'm afraid it's probably me

Yes, little by little. In fact I'm preparing a new GSoC project: osm.wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2017/JOSM_Plugins Trying to find issues with the PT_Assistant plugin

Wat mij betreft, hoorden die bij elkaar. Al zou ik ook begrijpen dat je zegt dat het om verschillende 'concepten' gaat, maar dan is elke bushalte een apart wikidata item en zou je ze in wikidata op de een of andere wijze moeten zien te groeperen.

Hallo Dick,

Sorry hiervoor. Dat is alleszins een nadeel van het selectief afhalen van enkel busroutes met Overpass API.

Ik wilde het gaan fixen en toen zag ik geen fietsroutes. 't Is pas toen ik die rotonde gewoon ophaalde van de server dat de fietsroute verscheen.

We zijn een plugin aan het ontwikkelen om busroutes te repareren. Op termijn is het de bedoeling om die uit te breiden naar fiets- en wandelroutes.

Jo

I usually put the name of MIVB in the name tag and the alternative names in other tags. I don't think there is an actual standard or correct way of doing it. Mostly what I'm doing is to preserve the name of De Lijn and TEC somehow, so my scripts can compare with them. I don't think any other reusers or software heed those tags.

Definitely bit off more than I could chew. Something went wrong with an upload, so the data was only partially uploaded. I tried to fix it all now.

I'm trying to fix it. It's probably due to the fact that I uploaded the relations I was done with one by one, instead of correcting them as a complete package.

Hi Forever,

It's good to see you're working on public transport in Brussels! When you go from the old way of doing things to the new way. You can create extra route relations, but please also keep the original one for one of the variations.

Salut Arthur, il y a un problème. Cette route est cartographié en double.

Por favor usar 's' en iD para dibujar edificios rectangulares

Please, don't attach highways to landuse. Cheers, Jo

This very strange shaped building looks like a tower of some kind to me, probably communication.

Also, I think it would be better to use UK spelling in Europe.

Blake, could you ask them to also add it in different languages (and scripts)?