Hello @pidugu konda reddy,

As your response is exactly a copy paste from the another changeset we refer, i guess you are also working for Uber.

Are you aware of this : https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines I can't find the documentation on the OSM wiki about your organised edits. Can you provide us that and if not regulize the situation ?

For the edit itself :

Can you clarified witch website you reffer ? You mentionned you don't copy it but you realy play on words ...
So how do you have determine the levels of footway, steps, elevator etc ?
Also for this object (for exemple) osm.org/way/1266853802 how do you determine the orientation and globaly the position inside the terminal ?

Thanks in advance for your responses,
Have a good day.

Hello @VLD549,

This edit is from November 2023 and you make a changeset comment about something that hapen on 01/01/2024.

Changeset discussion is "to discuss a changeset which seems problematic with the user who added it" not to ask something that came after and also not to ask "can someone" make a change because you don't know how to do.

Please as other user already ask you , refrain your comments if you don't understand correctly how OSM work.

Please leave a note with the information you have and local community will do the change. That's the good way to ask a change on the map.

Have a nice day.

Hello VLD549,

Official data Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB give the name Ashoekstraat. Can you provide the source you used to change the name ?

Thanks in advance,
Have a nice day.

Bonjour,

Il est indiqué ici : https://www.anderlecht.be/fr/securisation-des-abords-des-ecoles-scherdemael-p14-et-du-petit-scherdemael-m22 que les rues seront en SUL (sens unique limité) si c'est effectivement le cas sur le terrain, il faudrait ajouter oneway:bicycle=no pour ne pas fausser le routage vélo.

Une belle journée.

Hello Philippec,

Can you explain what is the purpose of your comment ?

I have added a mapillary key to object. This key represent the object and has the correct format.

So i ask you why you think this changeset need a comment ?

Also please , we are on a collaborative map : a minimum of polite expressions is apprecied when reaching out other mappers.

Have a good day,
Raphaël

Hello Philippec,

There is a problem with this edit and the previous one :
- You add https://imgur.com/pFB1PL8 indicating you are the author of this image and licenced under the https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/ But this image is a copy from https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=311881591750333 witch is licenced under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ That’s clearly a licence violation as you don’t share alike and you give a wrong attribution. Can i ask you to correct this on imgur or remove the image ?
- Mapillary key : correct format is numerical osm.wiki/Key:mapillary not the complete url. The use of this numerical key is a concensus on the community and if you want to add a complete url fill free to use other key but please don’t use it for mapillary=* because that’s break data format for data consumers and scripting analysis.

Have a nice day,
Raphaël

Hello Philippec,

For this one : osm.org/node/4065313123

The park has been refurbished and it’s no more the same drinking water location and model : see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=225700460360829
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=318528810874570

Can you fix oldest images with currents one ?

Have a good day,
Raphaël

Fixed for Vleesgracht (name and position (it's a culvert)

btw osm.org/way/1233514967 has a culvert part too (according to Urbis latest imagery and official wms data)

I don't find information for visbeek (the name) can you share your source ?

I listen the argument to promote discussion to tag this as picnic_table but :

- Most of other Havel's Place are tagued as bench , some artwork or memorial , i didn't find any picnic.
- Wiki is clear : "Use leisure=picnic_table, if it is a picnic_table and only a picnic_table." see osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table
- As data user of this poi when i travel , i expect (as many others) to find a place to picnic, meaning eating , drinking and have a little place to prepare ; here it's not the case at all ; imagine a family searching a place and find 2 benchs ...

For the technical problem (the base on osm : one object one taging scheme) what's the reason of changing the v1 ? For me it was perfectly mapped , no reason to include more error in the database ; i suggest to restore to v1.

Have a nice day.

Hello, Can you explain where you see dog=no ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=202430272224313
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=199851929145752

Hello,

No exception for bicycle ? asking because you have a cycle route here osm.org/relation/35053 and your changeset broke the routing.

if there's exception you must add : oneway:bicycle=no

Have a nice day.

For the building that don't appear , OsmGo hide by default polygons larger than 5000 m² if you uncheck this it will show on map (i recomand you to uncheck also the other default hiding) and check Make polygons selectable.

For changeset comments see : osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

vandalism reverted : osm.org/changeset/144369720

Hello,

Can you have a second look on this : osm.org/way/1211559733 ; the service road cross a hedge and a bus plateform.

Also in Bxl it's better to use Urbis aerial imagery than bing.

Have a good day.

Hello,

Thank's for your reply. I have surveyed the place yesterday , and the C11 are still present. (as repeated signal because you have C3 on all main entrances.

It's true that from Promenade du Chemin de fer there's no more signs (but the pole is still present , look's like was vandalised) : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=617947203875184

But in the Règlement de police concernant l'usage et l'occupation des parcs, espaces verts et
aires de jeux situés sur le domaine public de la commune de Woluwe-Saint-Lambert on Article 6.2 it's stipulate that it's not allowed : 6.2 circuler à bicyclette, trottinette, planches à roulettes, patins à roulettes etc... en dehors
des pistes cyclables, des chemins et des sentiers en dur.

The area and the ground path there are not "sentiers en dur". It's also stipulate on the "Règlement général de Police : "Article 82
Les véhicules non motorisés, les cycles, les trottinettes, les planches à roulettes, les skis à roulettes, et
les patins à roulettes sont interdits dans les espaces verts à l'exception des voitures d'enfants et de
personnes moins valides, ainsi que des cycles conduits par des enfants de moins de 11 ans et dans la
mesure où leur conduite ne met pas en danger la sécurité des autres usagers.
Les cycles, les trottinettes, les planches à roulettes et les patins à roulettes peuvent être utilisés aux
endroits spécifiquement destinés à cet effet.

There is no indincation that it's a mtb park and not stipulated that cycling is allowed there.

I understand that the place is used in fact but that's don't make it a playground and cycleway inside. (btw mtb mapping use track or path not cycleway) I suggest to use disused:highway=path with access=no for the ways and the prefix not: for the area. With leaving a note to prevent other mapper to redraw (better to not delete it).

Have a good day.

Hello,

Where this "Mountainbike" came from ? I'm little surpirse because the Parc is protected and access on this part is forbitten for bicycle :

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=7715844891821116

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=813807902949128

Hello Philippe,

Par exemple les Proxy Delhaize qui ne sont pas des Delhaize ni de nom ni de Brand, c'est ce qui m'a sauté aux yeux directement ; il doit en avoir d'autres mais vu la taille du changeset ça va prendre du temps à tout contrôler.

Un belle journée,
Raphaël

Hello,

Can you please be kind and give the source of the name of building ?

Asking because there's already Magyar Ház on the map on other location and at present time (passed there last week) the building is in major renovation.

I know that the Hungarian gouvernement buy the building but the only information that was given to the press was the building will be use on second semester of 2024 for the european presidency and maybe will become after a cultural center. They don't mention any name for the building.
IMHO it's to early to put a name on a building as there's no clearly source indicated this.

Have you more information to share ?

Have a nice day.

Hello,

No clearly a inattention mistake. Thanks for the fix.

Hello,

You have put the length of the 7L/25R on 7R/25L. Correct data is 3 211 meter not 3 638. That being said ft should be writen <feet>'<inch>" not ft. (see osm.wiki/Map_features/Units)

On another airports in Belgium, local mapper use meter as it's published like this in AIP. That prevend conversion error. EBBR is an exception and we have a mix and some "yoyo" on units in changesets history. I think it's better to keep this coherent and put units in meter.

Also you put incorrect length here : osm.org/way/517469023

Can you fix this ?

Have a nice day.