Hello,

Please read : osm.wiki/Multilingual_names#Brussels

We have to revert your changenset.

Avec plaisir ;-) Curiosité ici : les escaliers (à mapper) menant à la plateforme 5;6 sont munis d'une rampe vélo mais il est interdit d'embarquer des vélos à Chapelle ! #belgiansolutions.

Hello,

Because it's not the good building as i mentioned in my changeset link to this note : osm.org/note/3521247

This building or the previous one is not Bloc Dubreucq or Aile de l’Horloge at all : it's a mistake you introduce , please read links on note 3521247. Can you also provide me the source you use to make the name on the incorrect buildding ? Asking that because it's look like you misunderstand the heritage.brussels documentation and behind that , it's a copyright violation (you must provide the source at least on changeset comment if you use this website)

Aile de l'horloge was part of this building osm.org/way/260917455 and as i mentioned on my changeset comment it's difficult to find the original outline as there's only left the facade.

Hello,

A court saying there is no fence and no gate ? Reality indicate there is , and i make this to help people visualise theres is no access here.

It's a little trivial no ?

Have a nice sunny day.

Hello,

OSM data model don't reflect a legal status but a reality status.

Best regards,

Hello,

What is not correct here please ? I have consulted all the history and also CadgisWeb (public space) , IGN indicate there is a path, add a bollard to clearly indicated it's blocked by someone (using recent streetlevel imagery and also other older pictures) add it's a desire (see wiki) and set as private to prevent any navigation problem. The path exist and it's no more accessible, it's exactly what my changeset indicate. I have also add barrier and fence to clearly indicate the reality.

So i will do no revert.

Have a nice day.

"that shows the beginning of the bridge" : NO it's the beginning of the Deck (tablier ou Travée in French). A bridge is made of a Deck and a Abutment (culée ou butée in French). So previous geometry of the bridge was correct (for the part on Havenlaan) (minor extend of outline near Willebroeck can be made as my survey and knowledge of the construction history) so exactly the opposite of what you made @Jhowie_Nitnek.

You can find a publication of one the major "bureau de technique spéciale" in Belgium exactly saying what i say here : https://www.facebook.com/bureaugreisch/photos/a.327246661330950/791256421596636/?type=3

Also you use "Reverted " in your changeset comment but it's not a reverting you do (OSM wiki say reverted to a previous state or roll back ) You simply make a new change on nodes and you modified more than the previous changeset : https://osmcha.org/changesets/134704662/

So saying that this changeset is a mistake and should be reversed with proprer plugin.

Hello,

This changeset attract my attention because seamark with vhf 20 accross the canal in Brussels usualy take place near lock or movable bridge and that's not the case here.

So i made a survey this morning ; see pictures here : osm.org/note/3635087 and i don't find any seamark on the bridge or surroundings. So where do you :

- See a seamark (or have a document mention it)
- Take the seamark:name ? Is it guessed ?

review_requested : inadvertently ticked

Hello,

Please respect work done here.

133112338 : I have create a MP to fix a water inside a water.

133112737 is only adding different zone after 2 ground survey and a note sitll open. Your changeset comment is irrelevant and don't explain why you did that ...

Also by this changeset you add a error by deleting the MP and set it on a way ...

"Reverting" something wihout explaining why is realy childish even more when previous changeset was done to fix error you made.

Hello,

There is some problem in your changeset :

- https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/246311636 you move the outline of the building.
- osm.org/way/993055808 : you add generator to all the building, that is not the case , area =yes on building make also warning in validator, and even it's not necessery in other case : osm.org/way/1151355748 you can remove it to fix the typo. (set area is not a error but as your way are closed you don't realy need it).

osm.org/way/263981303/history also it's not all the building with generator, and as you can see it's on a construction zone, a part of the building doesn't exist anymore.

Can you fix the issues please ?

Hope that can help.
Have a good day.

Hello,

Why do you have removed network and operator info ? https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2571061754

Also please : osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Bonjour,

Ils n'occupent pas tout le building n'est-ce pas ? Pouvez-vous corriger le tir svp ?

par ailleurs : osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hello,

Please read : osm.wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Railways

That clearly stipulate that railway tracks don't have a name.

Hello,

Your edit remove a small part of "Rue de Kleinbettingen". https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/167273741

Can you fix this ?

Hello,

My concern was to correct the retaining_wall set on V1. (as it's planter) As a another mapper change "garden" to "village green" in v2 , i didn't change it. But you are right shrubbery is more appropriate.

Changed in : osm.org/changeset/132705166

Have a good day.

Hello,
You can use this tag instead : osm.wiki/Key:ref:vatin

Hello,

This changeset seam to be (for fuel) more notes than real fuel station, can you please check the POI you create and fix this ?

Best regards,

Hello,

Can you please check changeset history before making armchair mapping : osm.org/changeset/131637654

Your change has bee reverted.

On what source you affirm this building will be demolished ?