Bonjour,

Merci pour cette information, cependant, il me semble que celle-ci ne concerne pas directement le groupe de modification que vous commentez.

Ce changeset visait à effectuer une correction technique sur un « landuse » qui croisait l’église, ainsi qu'à ajouter des éléments « building
».

Je comprends que votre commentaire pourrait suggérer une erreur ou un élément problématique dans mon édition. Toutefois, après vérification, il semble que tout soit en ordre.

Pour plus de détails sur l’utilisation des « changesets comments », vous pouvez consulter la page suivante : osm.wiki/FR:Groupes_de_modifications#Discussions_d%E2%80%99un_groupe_de_modifications.

Une note aurait peut-être été plus appropriée dans ce cas.
Néanmoins, si vous faites un clic droit sur l’église et choisissez « Affichez l’adresse », vous obtiendrez : Église Saint-Willibrord, Rue Saint-Fiacre, Autelbas, Arlon, Luxembourg, Wallonie, 6706, Belgique – Place of worship.
Rue Saint-Fiacre est donc correctement déduite des éléments parents et n’a pas besoin d’être ajoutée à l’objet lui-même.
Pour plus de détails sur la manière d’obtenir le nom de la rue, vous pouvez consulter : https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=W&osmid=331996346&class=amenity.

Ajouter la rue n’aurait de sens que si l’église disposait d’un numéro de rue. Or, selon l’« Imagerie numérique SPW(allonie) PICC », celle-ci n’en dispose pas, et il ne semble pas y en avoir sur le terrain : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?&pKey=373622475722170

Je vous souhaite une belle journée,
Raphaël

Hello,

As the station is not open 24/24 your changeset seams suspicious ; the website indicated also something different : https://stores.delhaize.be/fr/shop-and-go-delhaize-metro-montgomery

From where this info came from ? Can you please fix this ?

Have a good day.

- For the name : effectivly long name is present on the ground : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=819125039117004 also with "variante like https://www.reflexcity.net/bruxelles/batiments/patrimoine/elements-classes/sites-semi-naturels-classes/vallee-du-vogelzangbeek sometimes with "vallée" sometimes not , while the legal document for pretected area omit this ; so i think we can keep the long name BUT as mentioned by bxl-forever that must match the billingual convention : osm.wiki/Multilingual_names#Brussels

Vogelzang should also be concerved as alt_name as it's in use.

For the boundaries : it was perfectly drawed according the document provided by the note author , but effectivly there is something that don't match because user provided a outdated document that was chanceled by the state council ; i reopen the note for this part.

Have a good day.

Hello,

Welcome to OSM.

What are attend to do here ? you deleted building 7 and add a strange name "co-ownership" is it realy the name of the building ?

Also in another edit you add layer=1 to avoid warning but it's not how that works.

In Brussels and in general in Belgium we don't add postal code or city this value are computed so no need to duplicate this data.

I recommand you to read this https://multimob.be/uploads/osm-handbook.pdf before making another major edit.

Have a good day

Hello,

You indicated Knowledge in your changeset source, but in Brussels if there is no signs the maxspeed is 30 km/h and it was like that when i passed there last week. We need to revert your changeset here.

Also for osm.org/changeset/153774681 you add psv=yes but the signs indicate only STIB allowed , so taxi can not use this way. And of course the maxspeed is incorrect. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=375957021531466

Have a good day.

Hello,

Have a look : osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Your changeset has been reverted.

Have a good day.

Thanks for the response, i re-surveyed today ; the gate you refer is here : osm.org/node/12009256097 , comming from osm.org/way/73491802 there is no signs or gate to restrict access ; i have set osm.org/way/28179985 with access=customers and removed the restriction to the accessible roads.

Have a good day.

Hello,

The signs say reception, visitors and collect and go : so the access is not private but access=customers

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=688347076184724

Hello,

This has already discussed here : osm.org/changeset/140797794

And all the detail is registred here : osm.org/note/3867076

(research and ground survey).

The fact is that Coordination Senne initialy put position of the spring on a "google map" on a wrong position and Bruxelles environnement copy that information on their map.

I have made multiple survey about spring in Brussels and in that case (and another ones) , just copy position without ground verification is simply a mistake because leefmilieu spring layer is a first phase of data that is not precise.

You can go there and check that there is no spring on the place you refer and there is 2 springs on the gardens. All this is detailled on the note and you have also panoramax and mapillary to prove that.

As i sugested in the note comment if you look on the coardination senne map you can see that they put the spring on the appartements building not on the street you refer. (still not correct but a warning to indicate there is a problem in the map)

The position i made is precise and based on osm.wiki/Ground_truth

It's a little painy that you add thinks without ground verification and when someone fix your mistakes you sound obligated to add comments without further verification , moreovere when users take time to fully documented their changesets.

Have a good day.

Hello,

Petit complément d'information :

En Belgique les bâtiments sont dessinés ou importé ssur base d'une imagerie numérique fournit par les régions, en l’occurrence UrbisAdmin pour Bruxelles.

Vous avez modifié la géométrie d'un grand nombre de building sur la rue Rue Molensteen alors qu'ils étaient correct. Merci de ne pas dessiner de building à partir d'image aérienne car il y a une distorsion. https://osmcha.org/changesets/152740688

Pour ce chemin : osm.org/way/1292743138/ en ajoutant bicycle=yes foot=yes ça veut dire que les routers vélo ou piétons vont autoriser le passage hors ça ne semble pas correct : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1198077914900385

Je vous conseille de lire le handbook de bxl-forever ainsi que la documentation de base disponible sur le wiki d'openstreetmap.

Une belle journée.

Hello,

Even the street sign is still there (i think it is) :

- It's don't indicate an access restriction
- The main Road is on public land (not cadastred in https://eservices.minfin.fgov.be/ecad-web/#/)

So for me this changeset is ok.

Have a nice day.

Hello,

From where came this name "Hôtel" ? In wikidata the name is from 2017 "Ancien atelier et maison du peintre Parmentier" and unchanged since today by you.

I can not find a reference that describe this building by this name ; can you give a source ? In any case the name of the heritage classification should be at least indicated.

Have a good day.

Hello, I have restored the crossing and the zebra is still in place : see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=941387164389924

Have a good day.

Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM.

OpenStreetMap est avant tout une base de donnée "permanente" et nous n'indiquons pas d'évènements temporaires, je vous conseille d'utiliser https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/ pour cela.

Et combien même un trajet est une relation pas un chemin piéton + vous avez passé outre tous les warnings de l'éditeur.

Le changement a été annulé.
Une belle journée, et soutien pour la manif de demain ;-)

Hello @pidugu konda reddy,

As your response is exactly a copy paste from the another changeset we refer, i guess you are also working for Uber.

Are you aware of this : https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines I can't find the documentation on the OSM wiki about your organised edits. Can you provide us that and if not regulize the situation ?

For the edit itself :

Can you clarified witch website you reffer ? You mentionned you don't copy it but you realy play on words ...
So how do you have determine the levels of footway, steps, elevator etc ?
Also for this object (for exemple) osm.org/way/1266853802 how do you determine the orientation and globaly the position inside the terminal ?

Thanks in advance for your responses,
Have a good day.

Hello @VLD549,

This edit is from November 2023 and you make a changeset comment about something that hapen on 01/01/2024.

Changeset discussion is "to discuss a changeset which seems problematic with the user who added it" not to ask something that came after and also not to ask "can someone" make a change because you don't know how to do.

Please as other user already ask you , refrain your comments if you don't understand correctly how OSM work.

Please leave a note with the information you have and local community will do the change. That's the good way to ask a change on the map.

Have a nice day.

Hello VLD549,

Official data Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB give the name Ashoekstraat. Can you provide the source you used to change the name ?

Thanks in advance,
Have a nice day.

Bonjour,

Il est indiqué ici : https://www.anderlecht.be/fr/securisation-des-abords-des-ecoles-scherdemael-p14-et-du-petit-scherdemael-m22 que les rues seront en SUL (sens unique limité) si c'est effectivement le cas sur le terrain, il faudrait ajouter oneway:bicycle=no pour ne pas fausser le routage vélo.

Une belle journée.

Hello Philippec,

Can you explain what is the purpose of your comment ?

I have added a mapillary key to object. This key represent the object and has the correct format.

So i ask you why you think this changeset need a comment ?

Also please , we are on a collaborative map : a minimum of polite expressions is apprecied when reaching out other mappers.

Have a good day,
Raphaël

Hello Philippec,

There is a problem with this edit and the previous one :
- You add https://imgur.com/pFB1PL8 indicating you are the author of this image and licenced under the https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/ But this image is a copy from https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=311881591750333 witch is licenced under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ That’s clearly a licence violation as you don’t share alike and you give a wrong attribution. Can i ask you to correct this on imgur or remove the image ?
- Mapillary key : correct format is numerical osm.wiki/Key:mapillary not the complete url. The use of this numerical key is a concensus on the community and if you want to add a complete url fill free to use other key but please don’t use it for mapillary=* because that’s break data format for data consumers and scripting analysis.

Have a nice day,
Raphaël