Das ist mein letzter Beitrag, bevor ich mich von OSM verabschiede. Es war eine schöne Zeit, aber in den letzten Wochen und Monaten bin ich immer mal wieder auf Rücksichtslosigkeit, Destruktivität und Respektlosigkeit gestoßen. War es früher besser? Ich weiß es nicht, vielleicht wird es mir jetzt nur bewusster. Auf jeden Fall ist die Freude am Projekt immer weniger geworden.

Rückblickend überwiegen aber die vielen Erinnerungen an die so positiven Begegnungen mit den Mapperinnen und Mappern. So schließe ich dieses Kapitel leichten Herzens.

Alles Gute! Robert (robhubi)

The key “name” is one of the 10 most frequently used characteristics of objects - according to Taginfo 100 million times. It is probably also the tag with the most errors. A random sample in my neighbourhood showed an error rate of 8.4% (N=1092). Possible reasons:

1. lack of knowledge
2. misunderstanding
3. tag missing

The proposal relates to point 2, possible misunderstandings regarding the meaning of the “name” tag.

Current Wiki structure

The main article names lists 14 different keys of the proper name, differentiates them from each other and from non-proper names and gives many examples. The article is quite extensive with 29k characters.

Of the 14 keys, 5 keys do not have their own wiki page: int_name, loc_name, nat_name, reg_name and nickname.

The article on the key name is similar to the main article names, only somewhat shorter. It is still quite extensive with 18k characters. All other articles are short.

Issues Main article “names”

Readability.

The text is very extensive and therefore requires perseverance. However, it deals with all aspects of name keys in detail and consistently. Many examples illustrate the basic idea.

Issues key:name

Readability, redundancy, clarity.

The text for the key name is very long at 18k characters, the essentials are lost in the sea of words. Much of it is a repetition of information that is already available elsewhere:

• The “values” section is almost completely contained in the main article.
• The “Variants” table is already completely contained in the main article.
• The table of language subkeys covers more than 3 screen pages and is also fully covered on the “Multilingual names” page.
• The sections “Road names” and “Additional data” are also already included in the main article. Only the sentence with “strapline” is supplementary.

In addition to the high redundancy, the text is also blurred. The core - the proper name - is not mentioned at all. The explanations lead to problematic statements.

… See full entry