Shore fishing is still allowed though, and that's roughly a 1/4 mile stretch for 5 months out of the year. Not sure the best way to tag that though. Looking at other states it appears that there's a few other small areas where fishing is allowed most of the time.

The best way to do this would be if the fishing tag had a "designated" option instead of just yes or no, but there's not much documentation on that.

Where would fishing not be allowed, do you think? I know for sure it's allowed through all of South Dakota (know people in GF&P)

Hi! Thanks for your contributions! Just so you're aware, abbreviating route ref modifiers is against the community norms for tagging route refs (see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kevinajames95-currently-mangling-tags-along-route-66-and-bannered-routes-elsewhere/106723). Feel free to join that thread for discussion. Thanks again!

Hi! Thanks for your contributions! Just so you're aware, abbreviating route ref modifiers is against the community norms for tagging route refs (see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kevinajames95-currently-mangling-tags-along-route-66-and-bannered-routes-elsewhere/106723). Feel free to join that thread for discussion. Thanks again!

Hi! Thanks for your contributions! Just so you're aware, abbreviating route ref modifiers is against the community norms for tagging route refs (see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kevinajames95-currently-mangling-tags-along-route-66-and-bannered-routes-elsewhere/106723). Feel free to join that thread for discussion. Thanks again!

They opened the bike path? Gonna have to check that out when I'm back in town.

no, not at all, don't know where that came from to be honest

fixed

Feel like I'm opening a can of worms here, but is the Dakota name for Touch The Sky Prairie on any of the signs or official sources? If not it might be better to leave the Dakota name in the name:dak tag and keep the name tag in English (might as well add a name:en tag too).

Changeset 10000!

Weird, must have slipped through the cracks, JOSM's been pretty good about giving me warnings when I miss one (these should be inholdings in the NF and there's a lot of them)

That was based on feedback from the OSM Americana group, essentially the idea was if it's more like a park where you can buy an annual pass it would be fee, but if you have to pay every time you use the road it would be toll. The distinction to me seems kinda flexible, but the way I'm conceptualizing it is that state parks, national parks, etc. would be fee and turnpikes/toll bridges would be toll.

Good to know, I'll get that updated. Someone had added the toll=yes tag to just the Devils Tower entry booth area so I just... extended it.

You're welcome! When I get a chance I'll split out the Wildlife Management Area

So I was looking at osm.wiki/Key:name and there was this line under the "do not use name=" section. "If a road has buildings along it with 'County Route 5' in their street address, its name is likely 'County Route 5'." To me, that indicates there should be a "North 56th Street" name here, but you're the local here so I won't push too hard for this.

I guess it depends where the access road for the data center will be, and how that construction will shake out. Another thing to consider is how the preferred editing software handles the tags, for instance adding addresses in iD is much less user-friendly without a name= tag. Maybe one of us should start a discussion on the wiki or the community forums so that the mixed messages shake out, as it seems the at least two of the most-used editors lean towards "everything needs a name= tag" while official name= policy is signed only.

So this is the name addresses use (go to https://tools.usps.com/zip-code-lookup.htm, type in "56th" and "68514"), should a road name not be put in the map because the local government won't put up a sign? I guess I added it in because so that it's in the OSM database, which other sources end up using for navigation. Maybe using this tag (osm.wiki/Key:name:signed) instead would work better, as then the name is in the database for other sites to use but the fact it isn't signed is still noted. Plus I swore I saw signage the last time I visited Lincoln but I could be misremembering.

I think you meant to add a node. Reverting back to S. Minnesota.

Should these be mapped as such, since they're only Census Bureau definitions and not actual civil boundaries? Maybe boundary=census for the unorganized territories?

Weird, iD must have duplicated all the Lake County edits I did (said I had unsaved changes when I guess I didn't), I'll check it over