Hi! OK thanks! Happy plotting!

OK! Thanks for the feedback! :) Yeah not always easy with third party services. I will correct the tag. At least it will be rendered correctly on most maps.

Bonjour! Cette haie osm.org/way/501782654 n'existe plus depuis au moins 2015 selon les images satellites SPW(allonie) 2015 aerial imagery. Veuillez ne pas vous fier à des images satellites trop agées. Merci de votre compréhension!

Hello! Thanks for having reported this! It looks like a track i didn't finish plotting. It's visible from the SPW(allonie) 2015 aerial imagery. It's tagged now.
Thanks for the compliment! Likewise for you! :)

Hello! You created this node osm.org/node/4958840621 without the tag "amenity=parking", instead you used a tag "tourism=attraction" and named it "Parking". My guess it's not a parking since there is no way for vehicules going to that parking. So what is this really?

Hello! You had created this track osm.org/way/449440189 but it crosses a fence visible on the satellite imagery at this position osm.org/node/5048773555 What is the real situation? Is it a former track since it's nearly overcrowded by grass, is there a gate, is there a gap in the fence... ?
Thanks for clarifying.

Hello! These 2 untagged lines are in the middle of nowhere:
- osm.org/way/511806993
-
osm.org/way/511806994/
According to your changeset comment, they were ways that do not exist anymore. OK... but what we can see doesn't look at all like ways: they are tiny lines, are not connected to any other way, so they seem to have been changed from their original position and/or of very little interest. May i suggest you that when you want to keep highways in OSM for whatever interest, you do it like this:
- keep the original position of the line if correct
- keep original tag "highway=..."
- add the tag "access=no"
- add the tag "description=..." (for third party users) and/or tag "note=..." (for OSM contributors)
- if it's a path, add the tag "trail_visibility=horrible"
- if it's a track, add/change the tag "track_type=grade5"
Example: osm.org/way/449713096

Also juminet asked you a question 7 days ago and you didn't reply yet, even before your newest edits that date from 4 days ago. Since the track is clearly not visible from any satellite imagery, one of its extremities is not connected to any other way, is not logic at all and finally you haven't responded,i think it's fair that i've deleted it and corrected the position of the unclassified highway since other surrounding ways were not connected to it and i had found another unclassified highway overlapping it...

Hello! You degraded many elements! I understand it's not easy but you have to check the beginner's guide and the OSM's wiki to make sure you are using properly all elements and their tags. I will correct them. Nevertheless, here are the errors you did:
- you had made this way as a cycleway whereas it's a footway where cycling is permitted, you have to check how the highways are tagged along the access tags. osm.org/way/180321136
- the corner (node element) of this grass area has been displaced and isn't anymore faithful to reality osm.org/node/2866096157/
- this way osm.org/way/367420592 has been connected here osm.org/node/3022768329/ which is clearly a mistake, be careful when you interact with node elements, way elements or area elements!
Also writing down "MTB project" as a changeset comment is not helpful at all. You have to comment about your changes, not about what is it for you personally.

Bonjour! Plusieurs problèmes sur vos chemins récents:
- ce point d'intersection n'est pas connecté, or toutes les intersection doivent être connectés pour pouvoir toutes utiliser les fonctions. osm.org/node/5018798695/
- Pourquoi "access=no" s'il y a "foot=yes"? Le tag "access=no" signifie que l'accès est impossible (vs privé mais possible par les propriétaires) par exemples pour cause d'obstruation de rochers, chemin détruit partiellement, etc...
- Evitez de former des lignes de ce genre: osm.org/way/513405423/
- En plus une partie de cette dernière ligne est superposée à cette autre ligne: osm.org/way/513405422/

Je vous laisse corriger pour que vous vous rendiez compte par vous même.

Hello! I understand you pint. But, as said in my profile... I won't comment anymore my changesets for 3 reasons... First, because some people think they are above the open source philosophy and force other users to use a certain workflow and/or tools to match their egocentric needs, so i want to impact this issue and make things more complicated for them. Second, I often make big edits so commenting them will not be pertinent anyhow. Third, many people don't do it anyway. Pessimist, no! Retribution, yes!

This changeset was exceptionally smal, so anyway very easu to find out what i've changed. Only 1 element.

Hi! I noticed for the 3'rd time that you're not placing accurately the elements you edited these last days. Check the offset of your editor's imagery and correct its offset with a procise source.

Hi ! Can you make sure that all elements you edited are correct please? For example:
- you didn't remove the old reception, you expanded the it and along deformed the small building Rentabike and the hedge attached to it
- you deleted partially a way which was one of the entrances to the camping, the extremety (this node osm.org/node/4361927258 of that way is left alone) Maybe adding noexit=yes makes it clear

Yeah but for now it doesn't, so in my opinion this little hack does the job without compromising the future fix.

Hello! Why did you make this former [landuse area](osm.org/way/70140267/history) also a building?? Making it a building inside another building... There is even a service way crossing it without any building passage. By deduction this can't be a building.

Wrong comment. See the history of the elements from the according changeset.

Wrong comment. See the history of the elements from the according changeset.

Wrong comment. See the history of the elements from the according changeset.

Wrong comment. See the history of the elements from the according changeset.

Wrong comment. See the history of the elements from the according changeset.

Wrong comment. See the history of the elements from the according changeset.