Hi, can you please repair the MP forest and scrub you've broken on this changeset?
osm.org/relation/3819372
and
osm.org/relation/5892898 Thanks for your comprehension! :)

Hi! Please avoid intersection points or lines like in the parking you did here: osm.org/way/406402836 OSMi repports this as an error: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=6.07802&lat=49.56657&zoom=18&opacity=1.00&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points In this case there was no need to plot around the building, you could just leave the building in the middle of that area since buildings have absolute priority for the rendering on the map. Please correct, avoid further error of these kind, thank for your comprehension. :)

...also the rest of the road leading to Ehlerange.

Hi, Rue Joseph Kieffer is supposed to be a Secondary Road according official sources (ref CR110). Please revert, thanks!

Bonjour, pourriez rectifier les erreurs signalés par OSMi que l'import à généré, SVP? A force d'imports sans correction, la carte française commence sérieusmeent à devenir un vrai foutoir sur OSMi. Merci pour votre compréhension! :)

! ! ! :O Private life exposed! Hahaha! Ca te fait marrer hein! MDR! :) Satané copy/paste qui n'a pas fait son travail...

Replied you in private message.

No problem for the late feedback. OSM is about free dedication. :) Indeed no one is perfect, myself i make errors and come back on tools like OSM Inspector to check if i didn't leave any awkward element.

You don't need to unlink them, they just share the same line structure for the mechanical of plotting, as long as the position is roughly OK. There is no rule in OSM Wiki that says they are not allowed to share the same element like a node, line, area AKA polygon, area relation AKA MP relation or other relations (for example virtual hiking routes on physical ways). So instead of having 3 or even sometimes 4 lines overlapping, there is only one line sharing all those elements. Sharing the same line for different elements allows many advantages:
- less data to be managed by the OSM server.
- easies plotting and future edits or updates.
- saves time
See it as an advanced method to plot in OSM.

The residential area surely describes a physical reality. :) It's for areas where people reside, in general it's an urban area. So by extension also for companies, retails and public buildings, but for these there are more specific elements. You certainly noticed that many users plot extensive resid. areas to define an urban area and maybe later on they plot more specifically the dedicated commercial, retail areas, etc. If they don't have the time or do not need that level of detail they leave the resid. area. as a more general approach. I guess it's not so important for small towns, villages... where sometimes there are just a few shops or companies.

Since you don't show up, I reconnected myrself the ways and corrected the MP.
Please, next time just make sure things are alright. :)

Thank you for your effort! Well appreciated! I can understand the mistakes, it happens even to experienced people.
Wishing you good continuation!

Hello! Got in here after seeing some MP errors reported by OSMi. See here: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=6.02512&lat=49.62985&zoom=16&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags

So please correct the intersections between the polygons from the identical MP. Luxembourg is one of the few countries which is clean in errors. Let's keep it this way!

Also, all those errors introduced a common error on the houses which have several times the same number. Normal, since you are using the same MP and its tags applied on several polygons of the houses. But I don't think this was your intention...

Je vais vérifier, je passerai par là aujourd'hui.

Hello,
When editing, please make sure that:
- ways are connected, otherwise planing routes and other routing functions won't work
- for MP relations, lines are connected and perimeter is correct
Errors since your last edit:
- osm.org/relation/5940626#map=18/49.76454/5.73299
- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=5.72771&lat=49.76137&zoom=15&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags
Thank you for your comprehension!

Hello!
Lately you've been adding elements out of which many have been plotted awkwardly, see OSMi for errors you generated: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.78219&lat=50.15186&zoom=13&opacity=1.00

Example 1: osm.org/way/392669827

Example 2: osm.org/way/391929264

Please, correct these and avoid generating shapes that introduce errors as it complicates future edits and might break elemnts.

I'd recommend using Multipolygon relations to generate areas on crowded or complex zones, they are easier to identify inner and outer perimeters, and easies workflow (no more need to double plot nodes). Read Wiki's page for info: osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Thanks you for your comprehension. :)

@SomeoneElse Good idea! I will think about it for the next time. Thanks! But it's really long to explain. Stereo knows me well for the loooong communications i can write.

Yeah i know, my edit was a test for a "substitute" at one of OSM's flaws. Obviously you don't get what's at stake. If you don't know, sorry, OSM comments don't allow enough characters for a full explanation. I explained the most important in my changeset comment.

Good job wolfv on the fast editing! I've reported this issue in the Github forum. The methods that the sex market uses on internet have always been pathetic...

Hello!

Please, be careful to not generate lines of MP intersections. See OSMi error here: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=6.58977&lat=49.63024&zoom=15&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags

I've already corrected it.
Thank you!

Bonjour!

S'il vous plait, attention aux intersections des MP. Voir l'erreur sur OSMi: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=5.90650&lat=49.46917&zoom=15&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags

J'ai corrigé.
Merci! :)

Bonjour, la façon dont vous créez les MP est incorrect: vous créez des éléments de MP en doublon et des intersections entre éléments de MP ce qui génère des erreurs dans OSMi (ca ne fait que grandir sur la carte). Le Wiki d'OSM explique en détail comment procéder (créez des lignes et ajoutez y une relation qui détermine si elles délimittent l'extérieur ou l'intérieur de la surface). J'ai corrigé votre erreur...