+ tag additions

Hi! Also why did you remove the tag leisure=pitch?

+ tag additions (information board)

+1

It's not the first time people tell you to use the established consensus in OSM's Wiki !

osm.org/node/6482425347/history

And these tags on this node??? There is no crossing with a road...

Please before using any tag, read it's meaning in OSM's Wiki

Hello! On this way osm.org/way/690898676/history you claim that the ways are not accessible in general with the tag access=no (access=* is the tag for all access, any means of mobility, transportation) while adding the tag foot=yes, bicycle=yes, it's contradictory. If you add access=no, this will render the way in grey on the map, that's how people will see that the way, they will think it is not accessible, raw OSM data is not necessarily visible. Do not start mixing access tags please, just edit elements for each type of mobility as they are influenced in reality.

Can you correct the data, please? Thanks

If there are fallen trees, add on nodes natural=tree and barrier=block and description=fallen tree, if there is no way to avoid the barrier add also access=no on all elements which are not accessible

If there is a fence, add the fence. This certainly means that the access is private, so add access=private on the elements which are private. Thanks

If there is a fence, add the fence. This certainly means that the access is private, so access=private on the elements which are private. Thanks

Hello! On this way osm.org/way/59361018/history you claim that the ways are not anymore usable for hiking, partially destroyed by machines and vegetation. That's already contradictory, but also you added the tag access=no (general access for any means of transportation) while adding the tag foot=yes, again contradictory (so hiking yes or no?). If the way is still accessible by foot, do not add access=no as this will render the way grey on the map, that's how people will see that the way is still usable or not, raw OSM data is not necessarily visible. Do not start mixing things please, just edit elements as they are influenced in reality.

Also the fixme key is not a explanations, rather use note=* if you want to explain only to OSM contributors, or use description=* if you want to explain to end users from the map or from third part services too.

Can you correct the data, please?

Oh OK! When making tests, i recommend to do that on empty locations where nobody will see it. Do not forget that Openstreetmap is used by other users and rely on it also for important matters. We should not induce users in error. I know you had written "test" but some third part services may not show that up.

I checked your test building, you don't need to specify that the inner element is an "area=yes", that's automatically done when you use the tag type=multipolygon in the relation.

Also please check your test on the map tiles as soon as possible and then erase directly. Do not forget to force your internet browser to update your map tiles by refreshing/reloading the website. For your information, certain zoom levels get updated faster than others, if i recall correctly, it's the zooms from 16 to 18 which are updated first.

Hi! Can you edit also accordingly the other elements, please? I mean... the trees in the building and i guess that the park area aren't anymore relevant... Thanks for your comprehension.

+ tag corrections

Hello, you totally untagged this element osm.org/way/138713551/history Is it destroyed?

Hello and welcome to OSM! You are not interpreting the tags correctly... As you said in your changeset's comment "the road is not suitable for pedestrians", but it does also mean that the road is still accessible to pedestrians. Instead of using the "foot=no" tag, which is a specific access tag instead of the more general "access=*" tag (for any mean of mobility), you should simply have specified that there is no sidewalk by adding the tag "sidewalk=none". It's not up to you to decide if an element is dangerous or not, you just contribute in OSM by adding elements you see from reality. See this analogy: after all there are trails in the mountains without any human structure and very dangerous, yet for tourism purposes, OSM contributors added those elements and tagged them as "highway=path" for hikers, optionally added a "sac_scale=* " to describe the difficulty.

In doubt, always check OSM's Wiki first before any edit: osm.wiki/

Please rectify, thanks! :)

+ merged equal elements

+ tag corrections

I'm on the site right now will correct myself there lil extras to edit. The western part is accesible for pedestrians.

Hello! You've put this track osm.org/way/34590473/history as a construction which served as a small crossing between 2 paths that are still being used, here: osm.org/node/401554684/ Therefore the routing between both doesn't work anymore whereas the tracks is crossable by foot though. Please make sure the network isn't broken when changing features. Thanks!