Hi!

About this way osm.org/way/51347577 do not add access=no if the way is public. That renders the way as grey therefore informing users that the way is not accessible for a reason. The combination access=no + specific access of mobility=yes enters in conflict in terms of routing services because of interpretations, oversights when updating and also In OSM's Wiki between contributors. There have been discussions with the rendering team of OSM's Carto, clearly the discussion has rather been negative since it complicates coding/interpretations/issues. I know in Germany many do that but it's not right.

By the way, I noticed your contributions for ways in nature in North of Vianden German side. Good job, it was about time someone completes there! I had prepared somewhat the terrain to explore and complete even more but since the rise of fuel prices, i can't permit myself, I'm from the SW of LU.

+landuse split/detailed

+ leaftype/cycle added

OK thank you for the information!

+ noexit added, barriers updated

This way osm.org/way/331424748 i've passed at entrance 2 days ago it seemed to be still a track from the entrance.

Hi! Why the change from track to path? What's blocking passage for an forestry or agricultural vehicle?

+ MP corrected

I just found some ways which allow cyclists to enter the N81, like osm.org/way/1106032634 so yeah indeed it is allowed to bicycles. I just want OSM data correct/accurate and myself i'm a cyclist.

As far as i can remember, this highway network has a specific history. It think it really used to be a motorway (autoroute in French) before the roundabouts were built. It's still awkward though to find inaccurate data in OSM for such a long time!

Thanks!

+ stores/shops detailed/corrected

+ new elements

Hi!
All the N81 is considered to be part of the E411 https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Route_europ%C3%A9enne_411 What is the source of your verification? Most importantly for the bicycle access.

+highways updated

Hi!,

The path was previously tagged by myself as railway=razed, for a former railway project which was abandoned during constructions. Next contributor changed it as path, Don't know why... I restored it only as railway=razed.

Next time, can you life cycle such ways in nature with prefix with "abandoned:highway" on the key when they disappeared naturally or "razed:highway" when concealed in purpose, please? It's only a question of trail erosion, they can disappear or reappear in a matter of a year depending of activities or even reopened. It tells contributors if such way was already surveyed, like an archive when we check on the LIDAR. By the way, you could have done this for the recent bicycle tour you deleted. Pity, it was quite some work! If you want me to restore it and lifecycle it, just in case the ways will be reusable, let me know.

Thanks!

Bonjour,

Désolé de vous le dire mais votre intervention a inséré plus de problèmes que de résolutions:
Vous aviez effacé ce chemin
www.openstreetmap.org/way/381988704 qui du coup on s'est retrouvé avec des multiples restrictions incomplètes ou qui n'avaient plus aucune logique sur le reste des directions comme ce "only straight on" www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7052796 qui ne permettait plus de tourner à gauche.

S'il vous plait, veuillez vous familiariser avec les restrictions avant de les manipuler. C'est du travail de tout remettre en ordre.

I was wondering about it! Good that you clarified! :)

+ naturals split/detailed/corrected, new elements

Hi! Great to see that you are motivated!

At v5 you've changed the tag of this field as farmland www.openstreetmap.org/way/662910455 , it's not incorrect but meadow is more specific/relevant. Since it is a land of grass for pasture or making hay, some meadow fields are walkable/crossable. For example via this path on another field: www.openstreetmap.org/way/482808032

If you haven't noticed in the iD editor, you can check OSM's Wiki via the button " I " then click "View documentation" for the complete definitions of features, their tags, their combinations, discussions, etc. Please, check it prior before changing features already created by more experienced contributors.

Hi! :)

Yeah I surveyed the path I told you about osm.org/way/1095397118 The access to the border LB001 (NW side of river) will be easy. The way is accessible and can now be considered as a track grade2, surface gravel (will retag it). There is a project in cooperation between the 3 countries to build a bicycle/foot network passing in that area, that's why i tagged it as construction. So the way is either an access way to the constructions or it will be part of the network, connecting to this way osm.org/way/424050934 I haven't surveyed the border on the SE side. Very likely you will need to pass grasses and bushes but it seems easily doable. I bet there are a few people visiting the border time to time, every year there is a trail on the aerial photos.

+ new elements