Do you think*

Do think there is any value to plot all private residential ways which obviously no one using the map will ever be able to use??? Of course you won't, there are already enough people like you who plot everything without even thinking about the point i just gave and that's why i don't want to spread even more. 🙄 Thanks for making it more difficult.

+ new elements

I know all that but that foot way is very misleading since it used to be public, also OSM has many errors so i doubt all users always trust the map and on some third part maps access=private is not taken into account. So i could have simply erased it but i bet someone would have plotted it back one day. Please, reverse your edits for that way with the tags i had put.

+ MP corrections

+ deleted the duplicated names for Forêt d'Anlier since one element is already featurng the entire area.

disregard this last comment, wrong changeset

+ deleted the duplicated names for Forêt d'Anlier since one element is already featurng the entire area.

Pour ce cours d'eau osm.org/way/590143870/ je suis d'accord, c'est plutôt un stream.

J'ai mesuré le Ruisseau de Fagnes avec cet élément osm.org/way/750576374 en prenant l'im sat "SPW most recent". A cet endroit il fait 5m de large. Attention, ce layer a un offset mais je pense que tu peux repositionner et vérifier sans problème.

Plus haut avec celui-ci osm.org/way/750585348 il mesure encore 2.5m Il faudrait un assez grand saut, non?

On est quand même sur une zone fort marécageuse donc le débit d'eau est certainement plus fort qu'un ruisseau. Je ne sais pas pourquoi il est appelé "Ruisseau" de Fagnes, je trouve il ne convient vraiment vraiment pas. Bref, je trouve qu'il faudrait le laisser en river.

+ new elements

Salut! Ce ne serait pas plus bénéfique de faire respecter/corriger les tags des chemins et autres imprécisions de position? ;)

Plus sérieusement, OSM est un projet international. Il y a eu beaucoup de discussions pendant les réunions à Arlon de promouvoir OSM en tant qu'outil touristique. Favoriser l'utilisation de références nationales au lieu de celles d'OSM induira certainement les utilisateurs/touristes. Imagine qu'ils se perdent, à cause des chemins imprécis/obsolètes, peu importe la cause, ils doivent trouver un raccourci car la nuit tombe et ils décident de couper à travers la nature pour retrouver un chemin... Tout à coup se retrouver en face d'une rivière au lieu d'un ruisseau (qu'il pourraient sautiller) serait très frustrant et les retardera encore plus. Ca m'est déjà arrivé pendant des randonnées et j'ai littéralement du courrir en pleine montagne... Rigole pas (au cas où), en courant j' aurai pu me fouler la cheville. ;) Perso je trouve ça super important pour la l'exemple énuméré.

Indeed! Sorry, i thought i had seen the history details. Thanks nevertheless!

Has the road been fully reconstructed and usable for cars, trucks, motos, bicyles... ?

Hello! Is this way back to normal and ridable? osm.org/way/501052305

Please check in OSM's Wiki and respect the difference between tags for each kind of element (node, way, area, relation), they represent something specific!
Example: osm.org/way/718925837/history

+ tag additions corrections

+ tag additions/corrections

tag corrections*

Hi Dan! I noticed your recent edit on a track from which these nodes around here got deviated from the original position: osm.org/node/6795255110/
I've been there about 1 month ago, made my updates and enhancements, so I'm pretty sure that track was set accurately since i aligned to the IGN im sat and Strava heatmap. Your edits were done 28 days ago, little time after me. Since it's a well establish permanent track with almost solid material grade2, i doubt that the track was changed. So i'm asking you if you observed a real change of the position or did you plot with you GPS trace? If you aligned to a im sat photos, i think your background was not aligned because on my side Strava's heatmap and any im sat i have are aligned with accuracy.

About this path osm.org/way/724559228/ i didn't observe any when i was there, i passed by several times on that spot. My activity: https://www.strava.com/activities/2680080842 So is it fresh new, like the soil has got recent activity, soil is not compacted?

Thanks in advance for confirming me your observations. :)

Hello! Careful you had disconnected some ways... Example: osm.org/node/6578695363/history