SafwatHalaby's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
169754532 | about 3 hours ago | To illustrate: The southern street which connects isn't any different than the east-west streets, so it's a bit arbitrary to map the east-west streets differently from the southern one. |
169754532 | about 3 hours ago | Hello, I fixed 2 things in the newly added roundabout: 1. It was missing the roundabout tag. 2. You mapped the lanes separately but only for a few meters, and then they converge. In my opinion, you should either stick to mapping the two lanes as one line, or map the two lanes separately for a larger portion (ending at some junction) Here is the roundabout after the update: Here is a nearby example with two lanes mapped separately. |
169205833 | 8 days ago | Thank you for switching to ESRI! It's more up to date. |
168623083 | 15 days ago | Another critical important point: Please do not move streets or buildings just because they are misaligned with the aerial. The aerial itself is misaligned. For example, see this street: osm.org/way/77355996 You've moved it slightly south, but the previous position is a lot more accurate. You can tell this by enabling the GPS Trace layer in the id editor. You should align your aerial maps to the GPS traces, this should be done whenever you move substantially to a new area (Since this is a mountainous region, aligning properly for one place will move another place out of alignment) Info on alignment here: |
168623083 | 15 days ago | Again, I'd like to thank you for the initiative! The buildings here have been out of date for quite a while. In summary, please consider these notes: 1. Right angles with Q
|
168623083 | 15 days ago | Please be advised that you're not using the most up to date aerial maps. ESRI World imagery is more up to date than Bing maps in this town. For example, have a look here: osm.org/way/1413123757#map=19/32.698005/35.034738&layers=N If you switch to ESRI, you'll notice you've missed quite a few recent buildings. This is particularly visible on the outskirts of both Isfiya and Daliat el carmel, where there's rapid residential houses growth |
168623083 | 18 days ago | Hello, and thank you for your building additions to Daliat el Carmel. It appears that you're not creating buildings with right angles. Please note that pressing Q will create 90 degrees angles and this is usually desired. Second, it seems you're accidentally snapping some building points to important polygons, For example, node osm.org/node/12987033942 touched the landuse polygon |
168019884 | about 1 month ago | שלום בנצי, שלט דרכים הוא לא אטרקציה תירותית. אני חושב שאתה צריך לערוך דרך openstreetmap.org שמאפשר לך להוסיף את סוגי האובייקטים הנכונים. כמו כן, נא להימנע משמות סרק כמו "." או שמות תאוריים כמו "מדרגות" |
168030889 | about 1 month ago | שלום בנצי, אתה עדיין מוסיף שמות לא תקינים. "מדרגות" זה לא שם תקין לנקודה אלא שם תיאורי. נא לקרוא את ההנחיות כאן: osm.wiki/HE:Israel |
168082219 | about 1 month ago | שלום,
|
167131290 | about 1 month ago | אני רואה שהכל תקין כאן עכשיו. תודה רבה! |
167522920 | about 1 month ago | Again, har Somek is both https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q12019181 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q26762500 , and you changed it from Q12019181 to Q26762500 Why do these mountains have 2 wikidata entries? |
167522920 | about 1 month ago | Similarly, both https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1584351 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q26762492 point to har Shokef, and you changed it from Q1584351 to Q26762492 |
167522920 | about 1 month ago | Hello, both https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q12019148 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q26763567 refer to Har Mehalel. Do you know why that is? You changed it from Q12019148 to Q26763567 |
167523732 | about 1 month ago | It looks like you changed the Haifa Wikidata from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q41621 to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q111124769 This seems like a mistake. |
167380674 | about 2 months ago | שלום. הוספתם כאן אזור פיקניק בתוך הים. נא לא להוסיף נקודות עניין לא קיימות למפה. |
167272233 | about 2 months ago | שלום, יקב הוא לא אטרקציה תיורתית. תוקן. |
167168691 | about 2 months ago | Hello, For a Hebrew speaker, גיורה is clearly a typo while גיורא is clearly the correct name. So in this specific case no source is necessary |
167121010 | about 2 months ago | לפרוטוקול: כבר נידון בפורום והובהר שההאשטאג צריך להיות בתיאור השינוי ולא על האובייקט |
167131290 | about 2 months ago | המקטעים מגיעים עד לצומת ממערב ועד לכיכר ממזרח |