هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق.

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.

It seems you removed name:he, but we always keep both name:he and name:ar, because the language of "name" is variable in Israel. In some areas it is Arabic, in others it's Hebrew.

A time-consuming followup would be manually inspecting the edit history of each person who added a node that was deleted in this changeset. Looking for easy ways to script this.

Method used for anyone curious: Downloaded nodes bearing "hot words" via JOSM+overpass, and manually inspected them.

the queries are often of the style node["name"~"hotWord"] or node["name:ar"~"hotWord"].

This node osm.org/node/2621574419 is part of the way, and it had its name tag removed.

In your particular example, if you zoom out a little, you'll notice there are 2 villages with seemingly valid names. Perhaps they also cover that area and it's all good after removing "الدار".

Thanks for pointing this out!

Indeed there's a village. I think it'd be best to rescan all removed villages and re-add them without the name at all, just place=village.

Unlikely. "الدار" means "the home". It's even less likely to have many villages bearing the same name right next to each other. (See my links, and those aren't all).

For instance, see these:

osm.org/node/1222021281/history

osm.org/node/1217865870/history

osm.org/node/1219409595/history

osm.org/node/1224322328/history

Are you sure 1224150978 is a valid village? I saw tens of villages all named "الدار", meaning "home". I assumed they weren't real.

According to map info, most people actually tag this as: amenity=shelter, shelter_type=bomb

What was the historical rationale for having the green line split into two at this section?

:)

You can ignore my comments. Digital Globe Premium appears to be perfectly aligned in this area. So relying on it is fine.

I noticed you shifted many existing buildings. This may or may not be correct. A good indicator is GPS traces: You should enable GPS traces (in iD: Background > OpenStreetMap GPS traces). GPS traces are always aligned correctly, and if they disagree with the Aerial, You can re-align aerial by clicking "Adjust imagery offset".

Removed in osm.org/changeset/50547120

So I added this hack to make the Eastern one render. We have a very unique case a country (or pseudo-country if you will) has "two" borders. Putting them both in the PL relation is bad because it messes out outer/inner, so I had to do this hack.

I think you're missing my point: Both 294464667 and 288825225 are disputed. So, there isn't anything special about either of them, both should be rendered the same. But only the western one renders, because only the western one is part of the PL relation which is tagged administrative.

Microwaves in public situations are very useful. Pretty common in campuses.