ddx_del: 0
ddx_nothing: 0
dxd_create: 10
dxx_update: 0
xdd_nothing: 0
xdx_delete: 0
xxd_create: 0
xxd_nothing: 0
xxx_update: 27546
update: 27546
update_touched: 31
update_not_touched: 27515
update_distanceTooFar_skipped: 0
update_distanceTooFar_ignored: 0
create: 10
del: 0
nothing: 0
touched: 41
total_newGTFS: 27556
total_oldGTFS: 27546
total_OsmBeforeRun: 27546
total_OsmAfterRun: 27556
New file download date (IDT): 2017-11-09_215746_Thu
Old file download date (IDT): 2017-11-08_220902_Wed

What is "the swing", exactly? osm.org/node/4717819413

The 4 xxd_create stops are stops accidentally deleted by me manually prior to running this. I forced the bot to re-create them. Normally, the bot does not always recreate user-deleted stops.

I suspect they've already introduced many weird access tags that were uncaught by our QA.

These access tags make no sense.

The DWG have soft-blocked Moovit Team, until they read this message: osm.org/user_blocks/1620

Fixed in osm.org/changeset/53611724

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/53617110

No need for a photo :), I was just making sure this was an intentional edit.
.
The bot is "change-friendly", it will not move back the stop, but I am investigating ways to report such problems to MOT. The inaccuracy is about 30-40 meters.

See: osm.wiki/User:SafwatHalaby/scripts/gtfs#Manual_cleanup_followups

Superseded by osm.org/changeset/53605594

See
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=665494#p665494
And
osm.wiki/User:SafwatHalaby/scripts/gtfs

What is wrong with osm.org/node/5187812857?

Hi Udi, can you confirm that you've surveyed and that the stop position was wrong? The old position was from the government GTFS.
.
If it's really wrong, perhaps I should try to report this to them somehow.

Hi, "Untitled Path" is not a proper name. The name is the name only: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
.
If you don't know the name, simply don't add one. If the road has no name, use noname=yes.

Hi Connor and welcome to OSM!
.
I have some tips that may be useful to you.
.
Unfortunately, this is not a dirt road, it's actually a waterway!
.
Also, it seems you simply wrote "dirt road" as the road name, but that's not how dirt roads should be tagged. The name is the actual name only, like "Baker Street". So, to tag a dirt road, click the way, then search for "track", and click "unmaintained track road". If you know the road name, type it, otherwise just leave it blank.
.
Thank you for your time, and let me know if you have further questions.

Hi, if I'm understanding this correctly, it seems your copied alt_name:fi to name:fi in Palestine relation (1703814). This removed the word "Palestine" from name:fi, and replaced it with (Israeli Arab Territories?).
.
First, this is factually wrong, Israeli Arabs actually reside within Israel and are 20% of the Israel population. Israeli Arabs and Palestinians are not the same population.
.
Second, this may upset some people and is a recipe for edit wars and I would suggest you keep the original meaning. Relation 1703814 should be called "Palestine" or "Palestinian Territories" or some variation of that, while relation 1473946 is Israel. So I would suggest renaming name:fi to "Palestiinan valtion" or "Palestiina".
.
Thanks!

Those access paths seem confusing. Could you explain the access status of this footway, so that perhaps we can settle on better tags?

Those access paths seem confusing. Is it a foot-only way?

Thanks for the fix