Let's look at osm.org/way/415288268. highway=path means people, bicycles, and horses are allowed. foot=no overrides people. So, the final result is that only bicycles and horses are allowed. Is this intentional?

Please note that ways affected by this changeset are listed just below this discussion. You can click them to see the latest version, or you can copy the way id to https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/ in order to see its history. As you can see (e.g. here: https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/415666260), you have added highway=cycleway, bicycle=no, which are contradicting tags, in October 24, and I reverted that in October 25.

As with other changeset comments, I was probably talking about access=no combines with foot=yes. It seems I've fixed this one since then.

Please see: osm.wiki/Tag:access=no. "The access=no tag indicates that the road is not to be used by the general public"

access=no - No one is allowed.
bicycle=yes - bicycles are allowed
foot =yes - people are allowed.
.
Suggested tagging:
bridge=yes, highway=path

...Or, if an osm link is better, see this way: osm.org/way/538975712
.
Since it seems you intended to mark it as "for pedestrians and bicycles", I changed it to highway=path, rather than the previous multi-permission tags. Can you confirm this is OK?

Just to be clear: It appears you often use access=no, foot=yes, highway=path. These are confusing because access=no contradicts foot=yes. Although the Wiki may have some rules for such tagging, it is much simpler to use highway=footway.

osm.org/way/538975196

Sorry. Last comment got mangled. Repeat: If an OSM link is more convenient: https://www.openstreetmap.org-/way/538975196

If an OSM link is more convenient: If an OSM link is more conve

As in the other cases, I'm talking about replacing highway=path + many permissions with simply highway=footway.
.
Exact object: https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/538975196

Yes. highway=footway is for people only, highway=path is for people, bikes, and sometimes horses.

access=no means no one can access it.

Hi, I am talking about redundant access=*, foot=*, etc, in many of your changes. Please see this visual history viewer for clarity: https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/538975712

...dedicated thread here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=673613

Hi Moovit Team and thank you for replying. I believe you've added redundant permission tags throughout the years. The problem is not the addition of a pathway, it's the access tags. For instance, osm.org/way/541053309, it has access=no, foot=yes, highway=path.
.
If it's only for pedestrians, the convention is that highway=footway is enough, without additional access tags. If it's for people, bikes, and perhaps horses, highway=path should be enough, without additional permissions. The additional access tags are used less commonly for fine-graining. Please see the Israel-specific guidelines[1] and the pretty similar global guidelines[2]
.
[1] osm.wiki/WikiProject_Israel#Other_Road_Types
[2] osm.wiki/Key:access
.
Can you confirm it's a normal footway? And would you mind if I retag all footways tagged in this fashion by you, and change them to highway=footway?

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/53897648

Editor seems to be adding personal "orders" or something like that.

هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق.

شكرا

Please avoid adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Bad edits were reverted.

I sent the following "support request" from their site, in case they're somehow missing this:
.
Hello, your OpenStreetMap editing account, "Moovit Team", is not behaving according to community standards. Since 2014, several users asked questions about many different edits, and there was never a single response from the "Moovit Team" account. OSM is a community where communication is expected.
.
Recently, "Moovit Team" was soft-blocked as a warning, but certain strange edits continued, and the warning was apparently ignored. No communication has been made from "Moovit Team" yet.
.
Please join in the discussion at this changeset: osm.org/changeset/53397135, and please read the now expired soft-block message: osm.org/user_blocks/1620. For the record, the Moovit Team account profile can be found here: osm.org/user/Moovit%20Team.
.
Thanks in advance.

Specifically, this way was edited after the block: osm.org/way/541053309