Sanderd17's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
92783737 | over 4 years ago | Hi mt_CSC, I noticed you mapped some parts of de Rijksweg as trunk. Can I ask you why? As explained in the Wiki, we reserve trunk roads to "autowegen", signed with a F9 traffic sign (osm.wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways) As far as I know, the R32 doesn't have any such signs, and for a part even has a 70 km/h speed limit. Also, when retagging, make sure you get all pieces. You missed several short pieces at the intersections, which cause ugly rendering. I'll revert it back to primary |
91058106 | over 4 years ago | Dag Scottdevos, op deze weg had je access=no gezet: osm.org/way/313376938 Dit betekend dat er geen toegang is, ook niet voor wandelaars. Ik ben dit vandaag gaan bekijken, en de weg is wel degelijk toegankelijk voor wandelaars, en zelfs een stuk voor fietsers. |
94201635 | over 4 years ago | Dag Peter,
Als je geinteresseerd bent in gebouwen/adressen, we zijn momenteel bezig met een gecontroleerde import van overheidsdata (GRB en CRAB). Geef gerust een seintje als je wil meehelpen. |
88295621 | over 4 years ago | Dag domvpatm. Bedankt voor je interesse in OSM. Maar ik vermoed dat dit toegevoegd pad uit de atlas der buurtwegen komt. In OSM kunnen echter enkel zaken toegevoegd worden die nog altijd bestaan (zichtbaar zijn in het landschap). Dit pad is niet meer zichtbaar en heb ik dus verwijderd.
|
94851314 | over 4 years ago | Handzamevaart wordt enkel zo genoemd tussen Handzame en de IJzer (het gekanaliseerde stuk). Stroomopwaards van Handzame wordt deze beek de Krekebeek of Krekelbeek genoemd. De Krekebeek zelf is de samenvoeging van de Kasteelbeek, Spanjaardbeek en Grijspeerdbeek ter hoogte van Kortemark (Krekemeersen). Dit werd gecontroleerd op historische kaarten van Popp, Ferraris, Vandermaelen en NGI. Buiten de spelling komen al deze kaarten overeen. |
91541667 | almost 5 years ago | Officiele naam is correct: https://memejulien.be/ Vraag is als vroegere café nog bestaat... |
88303203 | about 5 years ago | Sorry, forgot to commit that one change in Roeselare before starting in Ypres... |
86412137 | about 5 years ago | PS. some other local mapper has commented with the same remarks. So I believe a revert is warranted: osm.org/changeset/86549960#map=16/46.2266/6.1394&layers=N |
86412137 | about 5 years ago | == FRANÇAIS ==
Je vous ai vu faire de même dans de nombreuses autres régions, donc je doute que vous connaissiez très bien la région d'Ypres. Quelle est votre raison de marquer ces chemins comme cyclables? Pourriez-vous nous dire vos sources? == ENGLISH ==
I've seen you do the same in many other regions, so I doubt you know the region of Ypres very well. What's your reason to mark these paths as cyclable? Would you mind telling us your sources? |
36924595 | over 9 years ago | * by seeing the Cyrillic script. |
36924595 | over 9 years ago | Sorry for that. I didn't zoom out to see where I actually was, and just assumed it was Russian by setting the Cyrillic script. |
36926508 | over 9 years ago | Hi, When adding new islands, you must watch out that is doesn't collide with the existing islands. F.e. Little James Island is placed on top of an existing island now ( osm.org/way/395171744 ). Can you look into correcting this? Thanks. |
36924595 | over 9 years ago | Hi, I hope you understand English, as I can't speak Russian. I noticed you modified some boundaries here, and touched the coastline while doing the boundaries. You must watch out with changing ways tagged as natural=coastline. These define the continents and the seas. You must always make sure the the "land" part of the coastline is on the left side, and they are connected to each other. (see osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline ) I fixed the coastline for now, by tagging the boundary as coastline, but near the Ropotamo river mouth, the coastline still isn't correct (it should be at the high-water line instead of the low-water line, and connect nicely to the river area). Thanks for your work,
|
36743170 | over 9 years ago | Hi, I see you fixed some issues in this region. Do you have more info on what went wrong? Would you want to join the discussions at osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import and osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import Thanks |
36743059 | over 9 years ago | Hi, I was wondering how ENEO is related to this, is this an import of data from ENEO? Could you please join the discussion on osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import |
36749290 | over 9 years ago | Hi, I was wondering how ENEO is related to this, is this an import of data from ENEO? Could you please join the discussion on osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import |
34528109 | over 9 years ago | Hi, could you please drop by on the wiki and discuss if these buildings are related to the landuse import, or how you mapped them? |
16363186 | over 9 years ago | Hi, I don't know in what way you're involved in this import, but as you also edited some landuse data, may I invite you to join the discussion on the wiki? osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import |
33412357 | over 9 years ago | Hi, I don't know in what way you're involved in this import, but as you also edited some landuse data, may I invite you to join the discussion on the wiki? osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import |
36589814 | over 9 years ago | Could you please join the discussion about the import on the wiki? osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import |