OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
92783737 over 4 years ago

Hi mt_CSC, I noticed you mapped some parts of de Rijksweg as trunk. Can I ask you why?

As explained in the Wiki, we reserve trunk roads to "autowegen", signed with a F9 traffic sign (osm.wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways)

As far as I know, the R32 doesn't have any such signs, and for a part even has a 70 km/h speed limit.

Also, when retagging, make sure you get all pieces. You missed several short pieces at the intersections, which cause ugly rendering.

I'll revert it back to primary

91058106 over 4 years ago

Dag Scottdevos, op deze weg had je access=no gezet: osm.org/way/313376938

Dit betekend dat er geen toegang is, ook niet voor wandelaars. Ik ben dit vandaag gaan bekijken, en de weg is wel degelijk toegankelijk voor wandelaars, en zelfs een stuk voor fietsers.

94201635 over 4 years ago

Dag Peter,
Het adres van Alheembouw stond reeds op de site, dus hier was het adres op het gebouw niet echt nodig.

Als je geinteresseerd bent in gebouwen/adressen, we zijn momenteel bezig met een gecontroleerde import van overheidsdata (GRB en CRAB). Geef gerust een seintje als je wil meehelpen.

88295621 over 4 years ago

Dag domvpatm.

Bedankt voor je interesse in OSM.

Maar ik vermoed dat dit toegevoegd pad uit de atlas der buurtwegen komt. In OSM kunnen echter enkel zaken toegevoegd worden die nog altijd bestaan (zichtbaar zijn in het landschap).

Dit pad is niet meer zichtbaar en heb ik dus verwijderd.
Dit pad laten staan zou voor problemen zorgen voor wandelaars en fietsers die onze kaart gebruiken.

94851314 over 4 years ago

Handzamevaart wordt enkel zo genoemd tussen Handzame en de IJzer (het gekanaliseerde stuk). Stroomopwaards van Handzame wordt deze beek de Krekebeek of Krekelbeek genoemd. De Krekebeek zelf is de samenvoeging van de Kasteelbeek, Spanjaardbeek en Grijspeerdbeek ter hoogte van Kortemark (Krekemeersen).

Dit werd gecontroleerd op historische kaarten van Popp, Ferraris, Vandermaelen en NGI. Buiten de spelling komen al deze kaarten overeen.

91541667 almost 5 years ago

Officiele naam is correct: https://memejulien.be/

Vraag is als vroegere café nog bestaat...

88303203 about 5 years ago

Sorry, forgot to commit that one change in Roeselare before starting in Ypres...

86412137 about 5 years ago

PS. some other local mapper has commented with the same remarks. So I believe a revert is warranted: osm.org/changeset/86549960#map=16/46.2266/6.1394&layers=N

86412137 about 5 years ago

== FRANÇAIS ==
Bonjour, j'ai vu que vous avez modifié certains chemins. Vous avez ajouté bicyle=yes à un certain nombre d'entre eux. Pour beaucoup d'entre eux (tous ceux que j'ai vérifiés), il est interdit de rouler. Certains sont sur les fortifications de Vauban, il a récemment été confirmé par la mairie d'Ypres que le cyclisme n'y est pas autorisé (https://www.ieper.be/fietsen-ieperse-vestingen), et est également signé à toutes les entrées à ces chemins. D'autres sont cependant une réserve naturelle, où le cyclisme est définitivement interdit.

Je vous ai vu faire de même dans de nombreuses autres régions, donc je doute que vous connaissiez très bien la région d'Ypres. Quelle est votre raison de marquer ces chemins comme cyclables? Pourriez-vous nous dire vos sources?

== ENGLISH ==
Hello, I've seen you've modified some paths. You added bicycle=yes to a number of them. For many of those (all the ones I checked), it's forbidden to cycle on. Some are on the Vauban fortifications, it has just recently been confirmed by the Ypres city council that cycling isn't allowed there (https://www.ieper.be/fietsen-ieperse-vestingen), and is also signed on all entrances to those paths. Others are though a nature reserve, where cycling is definately forbidden too.

I've seen you do the same in many other regions, so I doubt you know the region of Ypres very well. What's your reason to mark these paths as cyclable? Would you mind telling us your sources?

36924595 over 9 years ago

* by seeing the Cyrillic script.

36924595 over 9 years ago

Sorry for that. I didn't zoom out to see where I actually was, and just assumed it was Russian by setting the Cyrillic script.

36926508 over 9 years ago

Hi,

When adding new islands, you must watch out that is doesn't collide with the existing islands. F.e. Little James Island is placed on top of an existing island now ( osm.org/way/395171744 ).

Can you look into correcting this? Thanks.

36924595 over 9 years ago

Hi, I hope you understand English, as I can't speak Russian.

I noticed you modified some boundaries here, and touched the coastline while doing the boundaries.

You must watch out with changing ways tagged as natural=coastline. These define the continents and the seas. You must always make sure the the "land" part of the coastline is on the left side, and they are connected to each other. (see osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline )

I fixed the coastline for now, by tagging the boundary as coastline, but near the Ropotamo river mouth, the coastline still isn't correct (it should be at the high-water line instead of the low-water line, and connect nicely to the river area).

Thanks for your work,
Sander

36743170 over 9 years ago

Hi, I see you fixed some issues in this region. Do you have more info on what went wrong?

Would you want to join the discussions at osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import and osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import

Thanks

36743059 over 9 years ago

Hi, I was wondering how ENEO is related to this, is this an import of data from ENEO?

Could you please join the discussion on osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import

36749290 over 9 years ago

Hi, I was wondering how ENEO is related to this, is this an import of data from ENEO?

Could you please join the discussion on osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import

34528109 over 9 years ago

Hi, could you please drop by on the wiki and discuss if these buildings are related to the landuse import, or how you mapped them?

osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import

16363186 over 9 years ago

Hi, I don't know in what way you're involved in this import, but as you also edited some landuse data, may I invite you to join the discussion on the wiki? osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import

33412357 over 9 years ago

Hi, I don't know in what way you're involved in this import, but as you also edited some landuse data, may I invite you to join the discussion on the wiki? osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import

36589814 over 9 years ago

Could you please join the discussion about the import on the wiki? osm.wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import