if so, the boundaries of bing or mapbox as *.osm should be communicated in the wiki, and I guess I am not the first person who tapped into this wrongly. I mean I found a relation of South-east asia and america. why not remove them and add them to a special layer like the map notes or map data to sea where is valid sat data available from bing and mapbox

So I guess you should not add relations of boundaries? but its useful, I dont understand the solution with osm file. can you explain

Oh thanks fpr the url, I didnt know that, but I was looking for some more infos about hires bounds

I dont know what ypu mean, I thought to update the hires bound to east of Sao Paulo. Sorry I will stop

Didi you play

Hey where did you get the infos about the wind turbines? greetings

sorry its #irq not #usa
also for the following sets
my mistake

page 1 checked added
page 2 checked added
finished

hey zarl, hate schon nen grund, wollte die installation nach osm.wiki/DE:Key:playground hinzufügen und vergessen. danke für die erinnerung

Hey, nur mal so aus Interesse, weil ich letztens überlegte ob man detailgetreue cad-zeichnungen irg.wie in in osm rein bekommt... wegen heutigem Ereignis. Diese ganzen Attribute ... kommen die aus der DWG-Datei? Ist das nicht AutoCAD fileformat. Kann man das einbinden in josm?

well done this is a commit

and actually did you know that the carriageways are abandoned, so please fix it the right way
osm.wiki/Relations/Proposed/Dual_carriageways

thx for commiting, sry

which one exactly, did you fix it? would be nice if you can point it when you commit something . because i dont see what you mean if you do not point it. thx

thx for commiting, I realized this problem too, because other mappers did add the wrong tag. I thought I did it right here, do you have a specific area here?

thx for the hint, it is about the trees right?

actually I deleted my dataset
and if you do so, please edit it on openhistoricalmap.org. There is 2008/2009 in the dataset: http://www.openhistoricalmap.org/#map=13/40.7710/-119.1962

If you say so, i can take it out, but then there is nothing, I mean sure there is nothing for 90% of the year. And yes bing sat tracks are not as accurate like your layout 2014 but to have nothing for something is also sad in my opinion. like to have a general draft, everbody knows it is changing but its also all year similar. What do you want? I thought its useful because you always have2switch to gmap to see something or search on the official webpage for maps,

I didnt edit locations, I mean the approximatly road lanes are every year at the same lane isnt it? The streetnames are different every year but its always starting with A,B,C,... and the numeric street names are also always on the same position, I compared all the years. If you know better you can edit, but there was no lanes at all, and this version gives in general a good overview. What do you mean if I didnt understand what you mean?

Yes, but in germany, I forgot to tag it with name:de, I corrected it