I just read about the Bing road detect API and I think it is sad but as expected to see that it isn't FOSS . I hope OSM continues to only depend on FOSS services.
OpenStreetMap
I just read about the Bing road detect API and I think it is sad but as expected to see that it isn't FOSS . I hope OSM continues to only depend on FOSS services.
Diskussion
Kommentar von Zverik am 5. Februar 2011 um 13:11 Uhr
Why do you hate non-opensource software and why it should not be used to edit OSM maps?
Kommentar von Pink Duck am 5. Februar 2011 um 17:59 Uhr
Probably because Microsoft could withdraw it (or start charging) at any point, no derivative versions from it could be easily made, requests for feature improvements could be ignored, etc.
Kommentar von Seizuka am 6. Februar 2011 um 21:25 Uhr
Yes, it is about remaining independent. The ability and license to use FOSS software can not be revoked. With non-FOSS software it can happen any time and with it all the hard work that went into it can not be used anymore. Allowing any one entity to withdraw something that would be part of the OSM project or that the OSM project would depend on is a bad idea.
It's not that I hate non-FOSS software, it is more that I would hate to not be able to use it anymore after I put work into learning to use it and into improving it. And as I'm a programmer I would like to be able to improve the software I use if I feel the need.
Also it should not be forbidden to edit OSM maps with non-FOSS software (someone who chooses to do that should be allowed to), but such software should not be advocated either.
Kommentar von RussNelson am 7. Februar 2011 um 04:17 Uhr
It's just a tool. It would be unfortunate if Microsoft chose to withdraw it. It would also be unfortunate if an Open Source tool on which many relied stopped working. It's less likely than Microsoft withdrawing the tool, but it's certainly possible. Open Source Software is better, but it is not perfect.